Scott A. Freling

Scott A. Freling

Scott Freling represents civilian and defense contractors, at all stages of the procurement process, in their dealings with federal, state, and local government customers and with other contractors. He has a broad-based government contracts practice, which includes compliance counseling, internal investigations, strategic procurement advice, claims and other disputes, teaming and subcontracting, and mergers and acquisitions. He represents clients in federal and state court litigation and administrative proceedings, including bid protests before the Government Accountability Office and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He also represents clients in obtaining and maintaining SAFETY Act liability protection for anti-terrorism technologies. Mr. Freling’s experience covers a wide variety of industries, including defense and aerospace, information technology and software, government services, life sciences, renewable energy, and private equity investment in government contractors.

Subscribe to all posts by Scott A. Freling

4 Considerations For Gov’t Contractor Carveout Deals

By Scott A. Freling and Alexander Hastings on Posted in Government Contracts Regulatory Compliance, Transactional Support and M&A Diligence
[This article was originally published in Law360.] A steady flow of M&A activity in the government contracts industry continues. Indeed, last year we saw over 100 publicly reported deals involving government contractors, and this pace has continued into 2018. This M&A activity has taken a variety of forms, including a number of “carveout” transactions, where … Continue Reading

The Future of Novations in Contractor M&A

By Scott A. Freling and Nooree Lee on Posted in Transactional Support and M&A Diligence
In corporate transactions involving government contracts, “novation” has become a dreaded process.  Many buyers and sellers express uneasiness and concern about having to subject their deal to the U.S. Government’s discretionary framework for accepting the transfer of a government contract from one party to another.  In particular, they fear the uncertain timeline and arcane requirements … Continue Reading

Key Takeaways From The “New York Buy American Act” And Beyond

By Justin Ganderson, Scott A. Freling and Sandy Hoe on Posted in Country of Origin, State and Local Procurements
[This article was originally published in Law360 and has been modified for the blog.] This was not an April Fools’ Day joke: The New York Buy American Act (“NY BAA”) went into effect on April 1, 2018. Signed by Governor Andrew M. Cuomo in December 2017 and championed by state legislators on both sides of … Continue Reading

Fraudulent SAM Accounts Lead to More Complicated SAM Registration Requirements

By Scott A. Freling and Alexander Hastings on Posted in Commercial Items, Government Contracts Regulatory Compliance, Uncategorized
GSA recently announced it is supporting an Inspector General investigation into alleged, third-party fraudulent activity in the System for Award Management (“SAM”). The GSA announcement suggests that fraudulent SAM accounts may have been used to divert certain federal payments to unauthorized bank accounts. The announcement does not elaborate on the scope of potentially impacted entities … Continue Reading

In Sexual Orientation Nondiscrimination Claims, “EEO Is the Law,” and Not Just for Government Contractors

By Jeff Bozman and Scott A. Freling on Posted in Employment, Government Contracts Regulatory Compliance
A few years ago, we reported on regulations governing federal contractors’ nondiscrimination obligations with respect to LGBT employees.  The Trump Administration has taken steps to roll back many Obama-era efforts, although the Executive Order and rules establishing LGBT-related protections for employees of federal contractors remain in force, at least for now.  The Second Circuit recently … Continue Reading

Key Takeaways from Trump Administration Memo on Buy American Laws

By Justin Ganderson, Scott A. Freling, Frederic Levy and Sandy Hoe on Posted in Country of Origin, Government Contracts Regulatory Compliance, Procurement Policy
[This article also was published in Law360.] On June 30, 2017, Commerce Secretary Ross and OMB Director Mulvaney issued a Memorandum to Federal agencies regarding the “assessment and enforcement of domestic preferences in accordance with Buy American Laws,” which includes the Buy American Act (“BAA”). Although the Memorandum purports to provide guidance to help agencies … Continue Reading

Key Takeaways From President Trump’s “Buy American” Executive Order

By Justin Ganderson, Frederic Levy, Sandy Hoe and Scott A. Freling on Posted in Country of Origin, Government Contracts Regulatory Compliance, Procurement Policy
[This article was originally published in Law360.] President Trump took a significant step this week towards implementing his often touted objective of protecting U.S. manufacturers and workers by signing the “Presidential Executive Order on Buy American and Hire American” (the “EO”) on April 18, 2017.  In addition to addressing reforms to the H1-B visa program … Continue Reading

Double Your Pleasure: GAO’s Annual Protest Report Shows that Sustain Rate Has Almost Doubled, But the Effectiveness Rate Remained Flat

By Scott A. Freling and John Sorrenti on Posted in Bid Protests
In mid-December, GAO issued its Bid Protest Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2016.  The report reveals, among other things, that GAO’s protest sustain rate for this past fiscal year (“FY”) was 22.56%, almost double that of FY 2015.  While this is perhaps the most notable data point, the report once again provides a … Continue Reading

Changes to Small Business Subcontracting On the Horizon

By Scott A. Freling and Alexander Hastings on Posted in Procurement Policy, Small Business
Last week, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) Council issued a Final Rule to implement regulations adopted by the Small Business Administration in 2013.  The Final Rule significantly amends FAR Parts 19 and 52 by imposing additional small business-related obligations on prime contractors and clarifying the consequences of failing to satisfy those obligations.  The Final Rule … Continue Reading

Post Hoc Proposal Reevaluation Exacerbates Error in Award Decision

By Scott A. Freling and Jade Totman on Posted in Bid Protests
Last Friday, the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) released a public version of Delfasco, LLC, B-409514.3 (March 2, 2015), a decision noteworthy because of how the GAO dealt with an agency’s post hoc reevaluation of proposals.  The protestor, Delfasco, LLC (“Delfasco”), had an incumbent contract to sell dummy practice bombs to the U.S. Army, and it … Continue Reading

Revised FOIA Statute May Increase Release of Contractor Data

By Scott A. Freling and Nooree Lee on Posted in Government Contracts Regulatory Compliance
On June 30, 2016, President Obama signed into law the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Improvement Act of 2016.  The new law revises FOIA to codify the Obama Administration’s policy that executives agencies adopt a presumption that openness prevails.  Among other changes, the act also calls for the creation of a new consolidated online FOIA … Continue Reading

FTC and DoJ Question DoD’s Proposed National Security Trump Card

By Scott A. Freling and Kathy Brown on Posted in Defense Industry
In an apparent reaction to recent efforts by the Department of Defense to obtain authority to approve mergers in the defense industry on national security grounds, the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission today issued a Joint Statement explaining the standard of review that the antitrust agencies use when evaluating proposed transactions in … Continue Reading

D.C. Circuit Declines to Extend Davis-Bacon Act

By Jeff Bozman, Scott A. Freling and Lindsay Burke on Posted in Construction Contracting, Government Contracts Regulatory Compliance
Some Washingtonians stroll through CityCenterDC on shopping sprees at “upscale retail stores such as Hermès, Boss, and Louis Vuitton,” or meet for lunch at “high-end restaurants such as DBGB and Centrolina.”  Covington lawyers watch these scenes from our offices in the northwest corner of CityCenterDC, where we recently analyzed the D.C. Circuit’s opinion holding that … Continue Reading

Labor Department Invites Comments on Regulations Governing Paid Sick Leave

By Jeff Bozman, Jennifer Plitsch and Scott A. Freling on Posted in Employment, Government Contracts Regulatory Compliance
Following up on President Obama’s Labor Day release of an executive order requiring government contractors to offer paid sick leave to employees, the Labor Department issued proposed implementing regulations and invited comments by April 12.  Contractors with service contracts should consider submitting comments, especially if they already offer paid sick leave and rely on that … Continue Reading

Defense Contractors Must Share (Even More) Information About Their IR&D Projects Before DoD Will Reimburse IR&D Costs

By Kathy Brown, Scott A. Freling and Alex Sarria on Posted in Defense Industry, Government Contracts Regulatory Compliance, Procurement Policy, Procurement Reform
The Department of Defense (DoD) will require contractors to disclose more information about their Independent Research & Development (IR&D) projects before the Government will reimburse IR&D costs, the Pentagon said in a proposed rule issued earlier this week.  The proposed rule, which was previewed in an August 2015 white paper, is the latest sign that … Continue Reading

Strict DoD Sourcing Requirements for PV Devices

By Scott A. Freling and John Sorrenti on Posted in Country of Origin, Energy, Government Contracts Regulatory Compliance, Utility Privatization
As part of an ongoing Department of Defense (“DoD”) effort to increase its energy efficiency,  late last month the U.S. Army committed to develop its largest renewable energy project to date — a 65MW  wind and solar  project at Fort Hood.  This ambitious project will need to comply with the latest DoD rules regarding sourcing … Continue Reading

OSAI Issues Guidance on the Government Contractor Defense for Certified Anti-terror Technologies

By Raymond Biagini, Scott A. Freling, Catlin Meade and Frederick Benson on Posted in SAFETY Act
Congress enacted the SAFETY Act in 2002 in an effort to incentivize the development of anti-terrorism technologies following the attacks of September 11, 2001.  The Act affords liability protections to sellers of Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technologies (“QATTs”) in the event of an act of terrorism where QATTs are deployed.  Although the SAFETY Act’s protections have not … Continue Reading

National Security M&A Trump Card for DoD?

By Scott A. Freling and Kathy Brown on Posted in Defense Industry, Transactional Support and M&A Diligence
The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, & Logistics, Frank Kendall, made seismic remarks last week announcing that the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) will seek independent authority from Congress to approve or disapprove M&A transactions in the defense industrial base for national security reasons, creating potential shock waves among the companies in that … Continue Reading

Lock Down of Nuclear Site:  False Alarm, with a Lesson Learned

By Raymond Biagini, Scott A. Freling and Catlin Meade on Posted in Energy, SAFETY Act
Last week the Savannah River Site (“SRS”) in South Carolina, a large nuclear facility owned by the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”), went into a lock down after electronic and canine scans of a commercial delivery truck attempting to enter the facility indicated possible explosive residue on the vehicle.  Fortunately, the lock down was lifted … Continue Reading

SAFETY First: Using the SAFETY Act to Bolster Cybersecurity

By Raymond Biagini, Scott A. Freling and Catlin Meade on Posted in Cybersecurity, SAFETY Act
We have already seen tremendous fallout from recent cyber attacks on Target, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Sony Pictures, and J.P. Morgan.  Now imagine that, instead of an email server or a database of information, a hacker gained access to the controls of a nuclear reactor or a hospital.  The potential consequences are devastating: … Continue Reading

DoD Moves Forward with Stricter Sourcing Requirements for PV Devices

By Scott A. Freling and Tyler Evans on Posted in Country of Origin, Energy
Earlier this week, the Department of Defense (“DoD”) issued a proposed rule to revise (and make stricter) the unique sourcing requirements applicable to certain photovoltaic devices that are used in the performance of DoD contracts.  Specifically, unless an exception under the Trade Agreements Act applies or a contractor secures a waiver based on public interest … Continue Reading

Renewed Pressure to Definitize Letter Contracts

By Scott A. Freling and Alexander Hastings on Posted in Defense Industry, Procurement Policy, Procurement Reform
Earlier this week, the GAO issued a report to members of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees regarding the Air Force’s compliance with definitization and reporting requirements associated with the use of undefinitized contract actions (“UCAs”).  UCAs, which commonly take the form of letter contracts, allow contractors to begin performance and seek payment before all … Continue Reading

Lost in Transmission: Email Failure Results in Untimely Size Protest

By Kevin Barnett and Scott A. Freling on Posted in Small Business
The Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) Office of Hearings and Appeals (“OHA”) recently issued a decision exemplifying the well-known reality that protest deadlines are short and unforgiving. In Size Appeal of Supplies Now, Inc., SBA No. SIZ-5655 (Apr. 30, 2015), OHA denied, as untimely, an appeal of an SBA Area Office decision. The appellant, Supplies Now, … Continue Reading

Federal Agencies Join Forces to Procure Solar Electricity

By Scott A. Freling and Alexander Hastings on Posted in Energy, Procurement Policy
Earlier this month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), U.S. Forest Service, Department of Energy, and General Services Administration (“GSA”) released a final solicitation for the Federal Aggregated Solar Procurement Project (“FASPP”).  Through the FASPP, these agencies seek to acquire cost-effective solar electricity at nine federal sites located throughout northern California and northern Nevada.  The … Continue Reading
LexBlog