FAR

As part of the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (“RFO”), the FAR Council issued a proposed rule that would implement — with some notable changes — the Council’s model deviation for FAR Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation. 

A number of those proposed changes to the deviation version have the potential to materially impact how procurements are run and bid protests are pursued.

In this series, we examine the proposed changes to Part 15 one at a time.  Now up:  Discussions vs. negotiations vs. clarifications.

Caveat:  There is a lot to unpack in the proposed rule’s revisions to exchanges with offerors.  For purposes of this installment, we focus on the line-drawing questions around clarifications vs. negotiations.

Continue Reading What’s New About Proposed FAR Part 15?Episode 2:  New Line-Drawing Questions for Clarifications vs. Negotiations

As part of the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (“RFO”), the FAR Council issued a proposed rule that would implement — with some notable changes — the Council’s model deviation for FAR Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation. 

A number of those proposed changes to the deviation version have the potential to materially impact how procurements are run and bid protests are pursued.

In this new series, we will examine the proposed changes to Part 15 one at a time.  First up is the late-is-late rule.

Continue Reading What’s New About Proposed FAR Part 15?Episode 1:  More “Leeway” for Late Proposals

On June 23, 2026, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (“FAR Council”) issued proposed rules covering several parts of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”).  The proposed rules mark the beginning of the long-awaited notice-and-comment phase of the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (“RFO”).  This blog post, focusing on FAR Part 40, provides an overview of the proposed changes to the regulations and the associated contract clauses in FAR Part 52, including the inclusion of requirements around the handling of Controlled Unclassified Information (“CUI”).

Continue Reading Proposed FAR Part 40 Rule: Consolidation of Supply Chain Security and Information Security Requirements and New Changes to the Rules

Over one year ago, on May 2, 2025, the FAR Council took the first concrete step in the administration’s “Revolutionary FAR Overhaul” (“RFO”) initiative by issuing the initial round of rolling model deviation guidance—a deliberate move to translate reform of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) from an abstract policy goal into acquisition text.  That moment marked the beginning of a new implementation reality: rather than waiting for a single, comprehensive rulemaking, the government began operationalizing the overhaul in increments, part by part, through deviations.  Now, a year later, the question for contractors is no longer whether the overhaul is “coming,” but how it is being implemented across agencies and systems.  This is therefore a good time to take stock of where implementation stands, where friction is emerging, and what sophisticated contractors can do to stay ahead of the curve.  For additional information, our prior coverage of the RFO roll-out can be found here and here.

Continue Reading From Paper Reform to Practice: How Agencies Are Actually Implementing the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul

On February 17, 2026, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, proposing amendments to the FAR to implement Section 5949 of the FY23 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”).  Section 5949 prohibits executive agencies from obtaining semiconductor parts, products, or services traceable to certain named Chinese companies – currently, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (“SMIC”), ChangXin Memory Technologies (“CXMT”), and Yangtze Memory Technologies Corp (“YMTC”) – subject to limited exceptions.  In accordance with the statute, the proposed amendments to the FAR would become effective on December 23, 2027.  The proposed rule is not yet final and is open for public comment until April 20, 2026. 

Continue Reading FAR Council Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Prohibition on Acquisition of Certain Semiconductors

A recent decision from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) is a timely reminder that, when it comes to stop‑work orders, the clause the government actually invokes—not the one it later wishes it had—can be outcome‑determinative. In Wolverine Tube, Inc., ASBCA No. 63877 (Jan. 22, 2026), the Board rejected the Air Force’s attempt to retroactively recharacterize a stop‑work order and held that the order expired by its own terms after 90 days. Although the contractor did not obtain summary judgment on most of its claimed costs, the decision breaks new ground on how protest-related stop-work orders operate, what happens when they lapse, and how far the government can go in arguing that “stop work” really meant “stop incurring costs forever.”

Continue Reading Stop-Work Means Stop Work (…Until It Doesn’t): Lessons from Wolverine Tube

On October 17, 2025, the General Services Administration (“GSA”) announced that it plans to issue a Mass Modification to GSA’s Multiple Award Schedule (“MAS” or “Schedule”) Solicitation[1] and Schedule contracts in November 2025 (“Refresh”).  Periodically, GSA may issue a Mass Modification to Schedule contracts to uniformly impose changes to the contract terms applicable to all Schedule contract holders, often as a result of changes in applicable law, regulation, or policy.  This approach also ensures that existing Schedule contracts have consistent terms, even though with the evergreen nature of the Solicitation those contracts have been entered into at different times and are at different stages of performance.

This Refresh (i.e., Refresh #30) will implement several significant changes with the goal to align the GSA Schedule with recent developments in the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (“RFO”).[2]  Although the full text of the Refresh is not yet available, GSA’s Refresh outline provides insight into the changes that are to come as GSA seeks to gain implementation experience with the RFO clauses, provisions, and ordering procedures through its Schedule contracts.  Given GSA’s leadership of the RFO process, and this year’s Executive Order to consolidate domestic procurement of common goods and services in GSA to the extent permitted by law,[3] it is no surprise that it has acted quickly to revise its long-term government-wide contracting vehicle according to these recent developments. 

Along with the Refresh announcement, GSA opened a 10 business day comment window on buy.gsa.gov, which we expect will close on October 31, 2025.  Schedules contractors will be expected to accept the Refresh no later than 90 days from its release which is expected sometime in November.  Below we discuss relevant background on the RFO process as it relates to the Schedule and anticipated changes to provisions and clauses in the Refresh.  We will continue to watch for updates as GSA’s implementation of the RFO unfolds.    

Continue Reading Overhauling the GSA Schedule

As part of the Trump Administration’s Revolutionary FAR Overhaul[1] (“RFO”), the FAR Council has released a model deviation for FAR Part 33 – Protests, Disputes, and Appeals, which includes changes that seem intended to make agency-level protests more appealing to disappointed offerors.  It remains to be seen whether these proposed changes will have the desired effect, particularly in instances where a protester wishes to subsequently re-file at GAO.

Continue Reading Revolutionary FAR Overhaul Seeks to Make Post-Award, Agency-Level Protests More Enticing

On September 18, 2025, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a civil False Claims Act (“FCA”) settlement against a New Jersey shipbuilder to resolve allegations that it improperly employed unauthorized workers to work on Navy ships.  The settlement, which exceeded $4 million, is the second this year involving government contractors alleged to have employed unauthorized workers in violation of FAR 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification.  With immigration enforcement squarely at the center of the current administration’s domestic agenda, government contractors should be mindful of this enforcement theory and take appropriate steps to ensure compliance and protect themselves from a costly FCA claim. 

Continue Reading E-Verify and the False Claims Act: An Emerging Tool in Immigration Enforcement

As part of the Trump Administration’s Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (“RFO”), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) Council has been releasing streamlined Parts of the FAR on a rolling basis.  We have been closely monitoring the RFO and its effects on the acquisition landscape, and publishing updates on the progress.  To date, 25 streamlined FAR Parts have been released on the RFO page of acquisition.gov, the most recent of which were released earlier today: Part 9 – Contractor Qualifications; Part 33 – Protests, Disputes, and Appeals; Part 46 – Quality Assurance; and Part 49 – Termination of Contracts.  Along with the streamlined Parts, revised definitions and contract clauses have been added to Parts 2 and 52, respectively.  And, a host of non-regulatory resources and commentary, from Practitioner Albums to Smart Accelerators is growing.

Notably, FAR Part 42 – Contract Administration and Audit Services, which includes Subpart 42.12 – Novation and Change-of-Name Agreements, has yet to be overhauled, and we wanted to take this opportunity to renew our call for reform of the existing novation process.

Continue Reading Time To Overhaul FAR Part 42?  The Novation Process Can Use An Upgrade