The Department of Commerce recently released a new funding opportunity to support semiconductor-related research and development using funds appropriated under the CHIPS Act of 2022 (Pub. L. No. 117-167, 136 Stat. 1366 (Aug. 9, 2022)).  Set forth below are a few key considerations that interested applicants should bear in mind when evaluating this opportunity, including that the Department may expect to receive upside (e.g., equity stakes) in selected projects.Continue Reading U.S. Department of Commerce Opens New Funding Opportunity for Semiconductor R&D

On October 17, 2025, the General Services Administration (“GSA”) announced that it plans to issue a Mass Modification to GSA’s Multiple Award Schedule (“MAS” or “Schedule”) Solicitation[1] and Schedule contracts in November 2025 (“Refresh”).  Periodically, GSA may issue a Mass Modification to Schedule contracts to uniformly impose changes to the contract terms applicable to all Schedule contract holders, often as a result of changes in applicable law, regulation, or policy.  This approach also ensures that existing Schedule contracts have consistent terms, even though with the evergreen nature of the Solicitation those contracts have been entered into at different times and are at different stages of performance.

This Refresh (i.e., Refresh #30) will implement several significant changes with the goal to align the GSA Schedule with recent developments in the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (“RFO”).[2]  Although the full text of the Refresh is not yet available, GSA’s Refresh outline provides insight into the changes that are to come as GSA seeks to gain implementation experience with the RFO clauses, provisions, and ordering procedures through its Schedule contracts.  Given GSA’s leadership of the RFO process, and this year’s Executive Order to consolidate domestic procurement of common goods and services in GSA to the extent permitted by law,[3] it is no surprise that it has acted quickly to revise its long-term government-wide contracting vehicle according to these recent developments. 

Along with the Refresh announcement, GSA opened a 10 business day comment window on buy.gsa.gov, which we expect will close on October 31, 2025.  Schedules contractors will be expected to accept the Refresh no later than 90 days from its release which is expected sometime in November.  Below we discuss relevant background on the RFO process as it relates to the Schedule and anticipated changes to provisions and clauses in the Refresh.  We will continue to watch for updates as GSA’s implementation of the RFO unfolds.    Continue Reading Overhauling the GSA Schedule

On August 20, 2025, the Department of Defense (“DoD”) issued a sweeping memo that tears up and rebuilds the way the military decides what new weapons and systems it needs.  The Military Services appear to be wasting no time translating the memo into action.  Acquisition leaders at last week’s Association of the United States Army conference emphasized that “Transforming in Contact” will serve as the framework for redefining requirements and reprioritizing programs—demonstrating that reform is already underway.  For its part, the Air Force has begun reorganizing its A5/7 directorate to assume greater responsibility for requirements generation, while the Chief of Space Operations has publicly outlined the Space Force path to driving requirements and resourcing.  

This “requirements process” is the first step in acquisition—it defines the problem and tells the rest of the system what to buy, build, or develop.  Change the requirements process and you change the entire defense marketplace.  For decades, DoD has used a system called the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (“JCIDS”).  JCIDS was paperwork-heavy and checklist-driven:  the Military Services (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force) would write lengthy justifications for new programs, and those proposals would wind their way through layers of approval at the Joint Staff in the Pentagon.  Critics said JCIDS was too slow and too rigid for modern threats, especially as China and other adversaries innovate quickly.

The August 20 memo blows up that model.  In its place, DoD is putting forward a problem-focused approach that aims to:

  • Define the biggest operational challenges first(not just collect Military Service wish lists)
  • Tie priorities to moneyso “important” projects actually get funded
  • Bring industry into the process earlierthrough experiments, not just proposals
  • Cut out layers of low value review

Below we unpack the memo and offer five practical takeaways for industry.Continue Reading JCIDS, Rewired:  What DoD’s New Requirements Memo Means

Two cornerstone authorities for federal contracting quietly expired on September 30, 2025, creating ripple effects that contractors—small and large—cannot afford to overlook.  The Small Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfer (“SBIR/STTR”) programs, commonly known as “America’s Seed Fund” for their role in fueling early-stage innovation, and the Defense Production Act…

Continue Reading Expired:  SBIR/STTR and DPA Authorities in Limbo

As part of the Trump Administration’s Revolutionary FAR Overhaul[1] (“RFO”), the FAR Council has released a model deviation for FAR Part 33 – Protests, Disputes, and Appeals, which includes changes that seem intended to make agency-level protests more appealing to disappointed offerors.  It remains to be seen whether these proposed changes will have the desired effect, particularly in instances where a protester wishes to subsequently re-file at GAO.Continue Reading Revolutionary FAR Overhaul Seeks to Make Post-Award, Agency-Level Protests More Enticing

On September 18, 2025, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a civil False Claims Act (“FCA”) settlement against a New Jersey shipbuilder to resolve allegations that it improperly employed unauthorized workers to work on Navy ships.  The settlement, which exceeded $4 million, is the second this year involving government contractors alleged to have employed unauthorized workers in violation of FAR 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification.  With immigration enforcement squarely at the center of the current administration’s domestic agenda, government contractors should be mindful of this enforcement theory and take appropriate steps to ensure compliance and protect themselves from a costly FCA claim. Continue Reading E-Verify and the False Claims Act: An Emerging Tool in Immigration Enforcement

On September 15, 2025, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (“ODNI”) issued the first public exclusion and removal order (the “Order”) under the framework established by the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018 (“FASCSA”).  The Order applies to all products and services produced or provided by Acronis AG as well as all subordinate, subsidiary, or affiliated organizations doing business under various names in support of Acronis AG.  The exclusionary Order has two immediate impacts on the federal supply chain.  First, federal contractors entering into new contracts or following contractual modifications are prohibited from supplying products or services from Acronis to agencies that are either subject to the Order or that have otherwise adopted it (“Covered Agencies”).  Second, contractors are prohibited from using products or services from Acronis in the performance of new and modified contracts with Covered Agencies.  In addition, certain agencies must remove these products and services from particular information systems.

Although the prohibitions apply to new contract awards, all contractors to Covered Agencies that have the applicable FASCA FAR clause (FAR 52.204-30) in their agreements must conduct diligence to determine whether they have provided or used any prohibited products or services in the performance of their contracts.  Following this review, the clause requires contractors to report the use of prohibited products or services to Covered Agencies.

Additional detail on the FASCSA exclusionary process and this first public Order is provided below.Continue Reading First Order Issued under the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act, Triggering Immediate Requirements on Contractors

This blog previously covered the Federal Circuit’s decision in Percipient.ai, Inc. v. United States, which addressed bid protest jurisdiction and standing at the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”), and seemed to potentially open the door to a new category of protests.  Now, in an en banc ruling, the Federal Circuit vacated that decision and reached a different conclusion on bid protest standing.  The Federal Circuit left the jurisdictional questions unresolved, but even if future decisions construe COFC’s jurisdiction broadly, the Federal Circuit’s decision on standing will likely limit the universe of new protests that might otherwise result from such a broad construction of jurisdiction.    Continue Reading En Banc Decision in Percipient.ai, Inc. v. United States:  Federal Circuit Holds That Only Actual or Prospective Bidders or Offerors Have Bid Protest Standing Under Tucker Act

This blog post discusses the Department of Defense’s (“DoD”) new cybersecurity rule that imposes certain cybersecurity requirements on relevant DoD contractors and subcontractors. The post will be of interest to all DoD contractors, subcontractors, and possibly affiliates of contractors that may be impacted by the new rule’s cybersecurity requirements.

On…

Continue Reading Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program Procurement Final Rule Announced

Though the 2nd Trump Administration has dramatically turned away from the energy and industrial policies of the Biden Administration, private-sector proponents of advanced energy projects may still find opportunities to partner with the federal government on certain Research and Development (R&D) or commercialization projects in the energy sector. 

Since January 2025, nearly all corners of the federal government have sought to terminate federal grants, loans, and contracts that the Trump Administration has determined are out of step with the government’s revised priorities (such as in the case of various clean energy focused programs or decarbonization initiatives).  Nonetheless, federal agencies have also announced new initiatives providing both financial and non-financial benefits for energy projects that the Trump Administration continues to support.  In particular, there are significant opportunities available for developers of nuclear energy, critical minerals, and geothermal projects, as detailed further below.  Continue Reading Opportunities for Advanced Energy Partnerships in the 2nd Trump Administration