Congress is considering so-called “right to repair” legislation that could produce one of the most consequential changes to Department of War (“DoW”) intellectual property rights in decades. Provisions advanced during consideration of the Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) would make Government Purpose Rights the default for certain technical data, computer software, and computer software documentation delivered under future DoW contracts, subcontracts, and other agreements.  Contractors seeking to deviate from Government Purpose Rights to impose more restrictive rights would bear the burden of identifying the affected material and establishing the basis for those restrictions by “clear and convincing evidence.”

The provisions respond to concerns that DoW may lack access to the technical information needed to maintain and repair military equipment without relying on the original manufacturer.  But the proposed solution appears to have impacts that go beyond DoW’s right to repair and broadly affect DoW rights to contractors’ internally funded technology.  At a minimum, this approach would require contractors to place a renewed emphasis on proposal and marking practices and relationships with suppliers; at worst, it may undermine industry’s willingness to incorporate commercial or dual-use technology into defense systems.

Continue Reading Right to Repair or Rewrite of DoW Data Rights? Five Questions for Defense Contractors

Several months into the Department of War’s (DoW) suspension of the next phase of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program, contractors are continuing to navigate uncertainty relating to the program.  With the Department’s review underway, this post takes stock of where the program stands, what remains in effect, and what contractors should be considering.

Continue Reading CMMC Reform Task Force Updates September 2026

On September 14, 2026, Deputy Secretary of War Stephen Feinberg issued a memorandum and an accompanying appendix focused on strengthening the defense industrial base by reforming acquisition requirements related to a wide range of issues, including accounting standards, efficiency, government oversight, procedural requirements, audits, pricing, and more.  Building on prior policymaking, including Executive Order 14402 (April 30, 2026), this memorandum directs agency actions aimed at making defense acquisition more commercially oriented and less dependent on government-unique accounting and oversight regimes. 

Among other things, the memorandum directs the Department of War (“DoW”) to shift away from the Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”) and increase its reliance on the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), including by advancing CAS coverage reform at the CAS Board.  The memorandum further directs a number of other reforms related to accelerating acquisition transformation, scaling advance market commitments, improving efficiency, reducing administrative burden, limiting audits, streamlining business system reviews, and increasing the use of commercial contracting and other transaction authority (“OTA”) agreements. 

Continue Reading Department of War Issues Memorandum Aimed at Strengthening the Industrial Base Through Acquisition Reform

Key Takeaways:

  • Ninth Circuit limited agency authority to impose grant conditions.
  • Court rejected executive agency attempts to define FCA materiality through certifications.
  • Decision found other policy-based grant conditions also exceeded executive agency authority, including compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws beyond federally funded programs. 

On August 25, 2026, the Ninth Circuit issued a 2-1 decision in County of King v. Turner, which involved a challenge to the Trump Administration’s imposition of new conditions on local government recipients of earlier-awarded federal grants earmarked for local homelessness and transportation projects.  

The decision will be of interest to federal contractors and grantees, particularly those encountering new requirements from federal agencies aimed at furthering current Administration policy goals.

Continue Reading County of King v. Turner Raises Questions About Executive Agency Authority to Impose False Claims Act and Other Certifications on Federal Funds Recipients

For decades, the United States and India circled each other as potential defense partners—aligned by democratic values and shared strategic concerns, yet separated by Cold War legacies and divergent procurement cultures.  Now, a proposed Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement (“RDPA”) promises to open each country’s military marketplace to the other’s defense

Continue Reading The U.S.-India Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement:  A New Chapter in a Complex Relationship

On September 3, 2026 the Department of War (DoW) issued Revision 3 to its Class Deviation and associated Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) that implements a new Part 240 (consistent with the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul of Part 40, which we reported on in July).  Like the proposed FAR Rule, this DFARS Class Deviation addresses supply chain and information security issues but is focused on requirements that are unique for DoW contracts.  

Continue Reading DoW Issues Revision 3 of its Class Deviation on Security Requirements

On August 26, 2026, President Trump issued Executive Order 14421, Declaring a National Emergency to Secure the United States Bulk-Power System. The Order establishes a new national security regulatory framework for a broad range of equipment, software, services, and supply chain relationships associated with the U.S. electric grid. Although the Order is framed as a grid security measure, its implications extend well beyond utilities.

Equipment manufacturers, project developers, utilities, contractors, lenders, investors, data center operators, and others participating in the energy sector may all be affected. The Order introduces new restrictions and uncertainty into energy infrastructure procurement and supply chains and, critically, it represents a fundamental shift in how the federal government approaches security risks in the energy sector.

Continue Reading The Electric Grid’s ICTS Moment? New National Security Executive Order Targets Foreign-Sourced Energy Equipment

A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) serves as an important reminder that forum selection under the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”) can have consequences that extend beyond a single appeal. In Gilbane Federal v. United States, 182 Fed. Cl. 177 (2026), the Court transferred a contractor’s claim to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”) even though the contractor could no longer have filed that claim directly at the ASBCA because the CDA’s 90-day appeal period had already expired. The Court concluded nonetheless that transfer was appropriate because a separate appeal related to the same contract was pending before the ASBCA.

The decision highlights two often-overlooked features of CDA litigation. First, forum selection is not simply a matter of choosing between the COFC and the Boards of Contract Appeals for a particular claim. Second, when multiple claims arising from the same contract are litigated in different forums, the COFC has broad authority to consolidate or transfer those disputes in the interest of justice and efficiency.

Continue Reading The Forum You Chose Yesterday May Control the Claim You File Tomorrow

On September 1, 2026, the Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”) Board published two final rules implementing seismic changes to cost accounting requirements for federal government contractors.  The most significant change implements a requirement in last year’s National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”), doubling the dollar value threshold for full coverage under CAS. 

Continue Reading CAS Board Rolls Out Two Changes with Significant Impact on Federal Contractors