Photo of Kayleigh Scalzo

Kayleigh Scalzo

Ranked by Chambers USA among government contracts practitioners, Kayleigh Scalzo represents government contractors in bid protests and other high-stakes litigation matters with the government and other private parties. She has litigated bid protests in a wide variety of forums, including the Government Accountability Office, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, FAA Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition, federal and state agencies, and state courts.

Kayleigh is a former co-chair and current vice-chair of the American Bar Association Public Contract Law Section’s Bid Protest Committee. She is also a frequent speaker on bid protest issues.

Kayleigh maintains an active pro bono practice focused on immigration issues and gender rights.

In Viderity Inc. – Costs, GAO found an agency’s investigation into a potential conflict of interest to be unreasonable where the agency “failed to inquire with” the awardee-intervenor “as to whether the firm had a business relationship with” an agency evaluator.  The decision was issued on September 1, 2026.  …

Continue Reading GAO Finds Conflict Investigation Unreasonable Where Agency Failed to Ask Awardee About Business Relationship

On September 16, 2026, President Trump issued a Presidential Memorandum (the “Memorandum”) titled “Restoring Reciprocity in Government Procurement,” which aims to remove Canadian origin items from the U.S. government procurement system.  The Memorandum provides few details on how this policy goal should be effectuated, but directs the following actions:

  • The Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) Director and U.S. Trade Representative, in coordination with the FAR Council, and in consultation with other senior officials as appropriate, shall “to the extent appropriate and consistent with law, identify and take all steps permitted by applicable law with respect to Canadian origin items in the Federal civil procurement system that can, where warranted, be removed or made non-available for purchase.”
  • The OMB Director, in consultation with other senior officials as appropriate, shall also “notify” relevant executive departments and agencies of domestic alternatives to Canadian origin items, “to the extent permitted by law.”
Continue Reading Presidential Memorandum Tasks Agencies with Removing Canadian Origin Items from Federal Procurement System

The U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) has extended the comment periods for its proposed overhaul of small business size standards and its accompanying Revised Size Standards Methodology by 60 days, from September 21 to November 20, 2026.

As we discussed in our prior post, SBA’s proposed rule would…

Continue Reading SBA Extends Comment Period on Proposed Small Business Size Standards to November 20

On September 14, 2026, Deputy Secretary of War Stephen Feinberg issued a memorandum and an accompanying appendix focused on strengthening the defense industrial base by reforming acquisition requirements related to a wide range of issues, including accounting standards, efficiency, government oversight, procedural requirements, audits, pricing, and more.  Building on prior policymaking, including Executive Order 14402 (April 30, 2026), this memorandum directs agency actions aimed at making defense acquisition more commercially oriented and less dependent on government-unique accounting and oversight regimes. 

Among other things, the memorandum directs the Department of War (“DoW”) to shift away from the Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”) and increase its reliance on the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), including by advancing CAS coverage reform at the CAS Board.  The memorandum further directs a number of other reforms related to accelerating acquisition transformation, scaling advance market commitments, improving efficiency, reducing administrative burden, limiting audits, streamlining business system reviews, and increasing the use of commercial contracting and other transaction authority (“OTA”) agreements. 

Continue Reading Department of War Issues Memorandum Aimed at Strengthening the Industrial Base Through Acquisition Reform

On August 11, 2026, the Small Business Administration issued a final rule that fundamentally alters how individuals may qualify as “socially disadvantaged” under the 8(a) Business Development Program.  Although the final rule largely follows the proposed rule from June 2026, which we previously wrote about here, the SBA added…

Continue Reading SBA Finalizes Changes to the 8(a) Program’s Social Disadvantage Requirements

A recent Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) decision shows that with the right facts, the government’s failure to award a follow-on Small Business Innovation Research Program (“SBIR”) contract can be challenged at COFC.

In Strategi Consulting, LLC v. United States, the protester, Strategi, alleged that the Air Force improperly failed to award Strategi a Phase III contract for its SBIR work while assigning that Phase III work to other contractors.  The Air Force moved to dismiss, asserting that (1) there was no “procurement” and therefore COFC lacked jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, (2) the protest was barred by the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (“FASA”) because it related to a task order award, and (3) Strategi’s arguments lacked redressability. 

Continue Reading COFC Finds Jurisdiction Over SBIR Protest

On June 11, 2026, the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) published a proposed rule that would fundamentally alter how individuals qualify as “socially disadvantaged” under the 8(a) Business Development Program (“8(a) BD Program” or “Program”).  The comment period will be underway until July 13, 2026.

This five-page proposed rule states that it aims to align the 8(a) BD Program with constitutional and statutory requirements and remedy what it characterizes as the discriminatory effect of the program in the past.

Continue Reading SBA’s Proposed Update to the 8(a) Business Development Program: A New Approach to Social Disadvantage

On May 29, 2026, the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”), together with several other federal agencies, published a proposed rule that would fundamentally change many aspects of the regulations in 2 CFR Part 200 governing federal financial assistance awards, including grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan guarantees.  The comment period will be underway until July 13.

The 412 page proposed rule states that it is aimed at increasing transparency, accountability, and oversight in federal financial assistance.  It provides examples of “the types of wasteful spending” that it is meant to target, including recipients “potentially misus[ing] funds to provide services for illegal immigrants.”

While the proposed rule contains numerous changes, this post highlights some of the most notable.

Continue Reading Proposed Rule Would Fundamentally Impact Federal Grant and Financial Assistance Framework

On April 30, 2026, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) titled, “Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting.”  This EO directs agencies to make fixed-price contracts the default form of contracting, and requires agency officials to execute written justifications to use other forms of contracting.  Of particular note for large contractors, the EO directs that, “[w]ithin 90 days of the date of this order, each agency head shall review and, to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with law, seek to modify, restructure, or renegotiate its 10 largest non-fixed-price contracts by dollar value . . . to facilitate use of fixed prices and performance-based incentives for contract deliverables to the maximum extent practicable.”

Continue Reading The New Executive Order on “Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting”: What Federal Contractors Need to Know  

On March 26, 2026, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) titled “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors,” the latest in a series of Executive Orders and related actions by the Administration targeting what it views as unlawful Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (“DEI”) related practices.  Most notable about…

Continue Reading New “Addressing DEI Discrimination” Executive Order: What Federal Contractors Need to Know