The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (“CBCA” or the “Board”) recently issued a stark reminder that discovery misconduct can be case-dispositive. In Venergy Group, LLC v. Department of Veterans Affairs, the Board dismissed a contractor’s $4.2 million affirmative claim after finding that financial statements produced during discovery had been intentionally manipulated to support larger damages calculations.
Continue Reading Discovery Fraud Comes at a Price: CBCA Dismisses Contractor’s Monetary Claim as a Sanction
Eunsun Cho
Eunsun Cho is an associate in the Government Contracts Practice Group, where she advises clients on a range of regulatory and public policy matters, including federal procurement, supply chain security, and funding programs administered by the U.S. government. She also assists clients with M&A diligence and compliance investigations.
Eunsun maintains an active pro bono practice.
Department of Energy Selects 278 Genesis Mission Projects
As we covered in our previous blog post, the Department of Energy (“DOE”) has launched the “Genesis Mission” to apply AI technology to a wide variety of scientific and technological challenges.
Last week, DOE announced it had selected 278 Genesis Mission projects for potential awards. The selected projects span nuclear energy, quantum computing, advanced manufacturing, and materials science, among other areas. According to DOE, the largest selection is a three-year, $60 million nuclear energy project involving 32 partner entities, including 4 national labs and more than 20 industry partners.
Continue Reading Department of Energy Selects 278 Genesis Mission ProjectsCongress Considers Further FOCI Reforms as DoW Moves to Expand Disclosure Requirements for Unclassified Defense Contractors
The public comment period for the long-awaited Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”) proposed rule, “Mitigating Risks Related to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence” (the “proposed DFARS FOCI rule”), closed on July 6, 2026. But recent activity in Congress suggests that the Department of War (“DoW”)’s proposed rule may be only one part of a broader effort to expand the government’s visibility into and mitigation of foreign ownership, control, or influence (“FOCI”) risks across the defense industrial base. Taken together, the proposed DFARS FOCI rule and pending provisions in the House and Senate versions of the Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) could substantially extend FOCI-related scrutiny beyond the traditional universe of cleared contractors performing classified work.
Continue Reading Congress Considers Further FOCI Reforms as DoW Moves to Expand Disclosure Requirements for Unclassified Defense ContractorsProposed FAR Part 40 Rule: Consolidation of Supply Chain Security and Information Security Requirements and New Changes to the Rules
On June 23, 2026, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (“FAR Council”) issued proposed rules covering several parts of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”). The proposed rules mark the beginning of the long-awaited notice-and-comment phase of the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (“RFO”). This blog post, focusing on FAR Part 40, provides an overview of the proposed changes to the regulations and the associated contract clauses in FAR Part 52, including the inclusion of requirements around the handling of Controlled Unclassified Information (“CUI”).
Continue Reading Proposed FAR Part 40 Rule: Consolidation of Supply Chain Security and Information Security Requirements and New Changes to the RulesWhat the Updated 1260H List Means for Biotechnology Procurement
On June 8, 2026, the Department of War (“DoW”) published its updated list of “Chinese military companies” operating in the United States (“1260H List”), as required by Section 1260H of the Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”). The updated list includes, among other companies, WuXi AppTec Co.…
Continue Reading What the Updated 1260H List Means for Biotechnology ProcurementDOE Announces a New Funding Opportunity under the Genesis Mission
On March 17, 2026, the Department of Energy (“DOE”) issued a Request for Application (“RFA”) under the Genesis Mission, a White House-led AI initiative announced in November 2025. The RFA, with $293.76 million in anticipated total funding, solicits project proposals for 21 areas ranging from advanced manufacturing and industrial productivity to energy and nuclear physics. Applications for Phase I and letters of intent for Phase II are both due April 28, 2026. This blog post reviews the development of the Genesis Mission since last year and summarizes the key elements of the current funding opportunity.
Continue Reading DOE Announces a New Funding Opportunity under the Genesis MissionDOE Announces Funding Opportunity for Domestic Critical Materials Processing, Recycling, and Manufacturing
On March 13, 2026, the Department of Energy issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for projects supporting the development of domestic processing, manufacturing, and recycling capabilities for battery materials. With $500 million in total available funding, the NOFO solicits proposals in three topic areas: (1) domestic critical minerals processing from raw feedstocks, (2) domestic critical minerals recycling, and (3) domestic battery materials and component manufacturing. Letters of intent are due March 27, 2026, and full applications are due April 24, 2026.
Continue Reading DOE Announces Funding Opportunity for Domestic Critical Materials Processing, Recycling, and ManufacturingDefense Industrial Base Consortium Issues New Critical Minerals Request for Project Proposals
Introduction
On February 27, 2026, the Defense Industrial Base Consortium (DIBC) issued a new Request for Project Proposals (RPP) focused on Strategic and Critical Materials. Phase 1 submissions are due March 20, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern).
This solicitation represents the second DIBC RPP targeting critical minerals since the issuance of Executive Order (EO) 14241, “Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production.” The EO directed federal agencies to expand domestic access to critical minerals and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains.
Continue Reading Defense Industrial Base Consortium Issues New Critical Minerals Request for Project ProposalsFAR Council Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Prohibition on Acquisition of Certain Semiconductors
On February 17, 2026, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, proposing amendments to the FAR to implement Section 5949 of the FY23 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”). Section 5949 prohibits executive agencies from obtaining semiconductor parts, products, or services traceable to certain named Chinese companies – currently, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (“SMIC”), ChangXin Memory Technologies (“CXMT”), and Yangtze Memory Technologies Corp (“YMTC”) – subject to limited exceptions. In accordance with the statute, the proposed amendments to the FAR would become effective on December 23, 2027. The proposed rule is not yet final and is open for public comment until April 20, 2026.
Continue Reading FAR Council Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Prohibition on Acquisition of Certain SemiconductorsOMB Rescinds the “Common Form” Secure Software Attestation Requirement
On January 23, 2026, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-26-05 “Adopting a Risk-based Approach to Software and Hardware Security,” which rescinds a previous Biden Administration’s requirement for all federal agencies to obtain a self-attestation from software producers in the “Common Form” developed by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) before using certain third-party software. As its rationale, OMB noted that the prior memoranda diverted agencies from developing tailored assurance requirements and failed to account for threats posed by insecure hardware. Memorandum M-26-05 signals that the federal government is moving away from a “one-size fits-all” approach to software security and will instead allow each agency to develop tailored requirements. In creating their own assurance requirements, agencies may still require a self-attestation and/or Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) from the software vendor if the agency determines that such assurances are necessary based on the risks involved and the agency’s needs.
Continue Reading OMB Rescinds the “Common Form” Secure Software Attestation Requirement