Photo of Jennifer Bentley

Jennifer Bentley

Jennifer Bentley represents government contractors in a range of matters, with an emphasis on litigation, investigations, claims and disputes, and regulatory counseling. She also has deep expertise in government contracts domestic sourcing and supply chain issues, including the Buy American Act, Trade Agreements Act, Build America, Buy America, and the BIOSECURE Act.

She has represented government contractors in False Claims Act investigations, prime-subcontractor disputes in federal court, disputes before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, cost accounting disputes, and bid protests at the Government Accountability Office and U.S. Court of Federal Claims. She maintains an active pro bono practice.

Contact:Read more about Jennifer BentleyEmail

A recent Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) decision shows that with the right facts, the government’s failure to award a follow-on Small Business Innovation Research Program (“SBIR”) contract can be challenged at COFC.

In Strategi Consulting, LLC v. United States, the protester, Strategi, alleged that the Air Force improperly failed to award Strategi a Phase III contract for its SBIR work while assigning that Phase III work to other contractors.  The Air Force moved to dismiss, asserting that (1) there was no “procurement” and therefore COFC lacked jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, (2) the protest was barred by the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (“FASA”) because it related to a task order award, and (3) Strategi’s arguments lacked redressability. 

Continue Reading COFC Finds Jurisdiction Over SBIR Protest

The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the “ASBCA” or “Board”) recently rejected an unprecedented request from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) to withhold publication of a Board decision on the merits in a construction delay appeal brought by KiewitPhelps.  In a decision issued on June 25, 2026 (released publicly on July 16, 2026), the Board held that it was bound by the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) and its own rules to publish the decision, and that the Corps had not demonstrated a basis for overcoming that requirement.  This decision is noteworthy not only because the Board found no legal basis to suppress the opinion, but also because, as the Board observed, such a request had never before been directly presented to the Board.

Continue Reading ASBCA Denies Unprecedented Request to Keep Decision Out of Public View

On June 8, 2026, the Department of War (“DoW”) published its updated list of “Chinese military companies” operating in the United States (“1260H List”), as required by Section 1260H of the Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”).  The updated list includes, among other companies, WuXi AppTec Co.…

Continue Reading What the Updated 1260H List Means for Biotechnology Procurement

After failing to be included in the Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) or passed as a standalone piece of legislation, the BIOSECURE Act has moved closer to finally being enacted after it was included in the final FY 2026 NDAA text released by Congress on December 7, 2025.  Section 851 of the FY 2026 NDAA is titled “Prohibition on Contracting with Certain Biotechnology Providers,” but includes in substance what was previously introduced and considered in Congress as the BIOSECURE Act. 

The bill has the potential to impose significant restrictions on the use of certain Chinese companies in the supply chain for products procured by the U.S. Government and accordingly has been of interest to industry over the last few years.  This blog post summarizes the scope of the bill, highlights the changes in the FY 2026 NDAA text as compared to prior iterations of the bill, and flags key considerations for government contractors in the life sciences space.

Continue Reading BIOSECURE Act Moves Closer to Enactment with Inclusion in FY 2026 NDAA Text

As fiscal year (“FY”) 2025 closes, both the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”) and Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (“CBCA”) released their annual reports.  Together, the two reports provide a useful snapshot of case volumes, outcomes, agency trends, and procedural developments.  We break down the findings and, most importantly, what they mean for contractors navigating claims and disputes in FY 2026.

Continue Reading Top Five Trends and Takeaways from the FY 2025 ASBCA and CBCA Annual Reports

On August 6, 2025, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) Council issued a final rule clarifying that contractors do not need to maintain a continuous registration in the System for Award Management (“SAM”) in the time between submitting a bid or proposal and contract award.  The final rule makes no changes to the interim rule issued in November 2024, which was immediately effective at that time.  This important clarification provides some flexibility to contractors to protect their contract awards against protests based on an administrative lapse.

Continue Reading FAR Council Clarifies SAM Registration Timing for Bidders

On January 14, 2025, the Department of Transportation’s (“DOT”) Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”) published a final rule ending its longstanding waiver of Buy America requirements for manufactured products (the “Manufactured Products Waiver”) and setting out new standards for the use of domestic content on FHWA-funded infrastructure projects.  As discussed in our previous post, FHWA proposed rescinding its decades-old waiver in March 2024 in accordance with the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act’s Build America, Buy America (“BABA”) focus on expanding Buy America coverage and discouraging the use of general applicability waivers.  The final rule is similar in substance to the proposed rule but adds a staggered implementation period, which will allow contractors additional time to come into compliance.

Continue Reading Federal Highway Administration Publishes Final Rule Rescinding Longstanding Buy America Waiver for Manufactured Products

On May 16, 2024, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) published Notice 2024-41 (the “2024 Guidance”), which provides new guidance for securing the domestic content bonus credit established by the Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”).  As described in more detail below, the 2024 Guidance builds on the existing framework contained in Notice 2023-38 (the “2023 Guidance”), which was released last May.  Most notably, the 2024 Guidance expands the range of applicable projects subject to the safe harbor in the 2023 Guidance and adds a “New Elective Safe Harbor” to determine cost percentages for the domestic content calculation in solar, onshore wind, and battery storage projects.

Continue Reading Treasury and IRS Release New Guidance on Inflation Reduction Act Domestic Content Bonus Credit

On March 7, 2024, the Department of Transportation’s (“DOT”) Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”) announced a proposed rule to rescind a longstanding general waiver of Buy America requirements for manufactured products (the “Manufactured Products Waiver”).  If finalized, this would be a major change for the agency, reversing a policy that has been in place for more than 40 years.

FHWA has imposed Buy America requirements for domestic iron and steel on its projects since 1978 (see 23 U.S.C. § 313; 23 CFR § 635.410), but in 1983, the agency determined that it was in the public interest to waive the requirement as to manufactured products based on the agency’s belief that manufactured products were not used in federal highway projects in sufficient quantities to have an effect on the overall cost of a project and therefore did not require Buy America protections.  That general waiver has been in place ever since.

This change in policy comes in the wake of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act’s Build America, Buy America (“BABA”) provisions, which expanded Buy America coverage broadly in federal financial assistance programs for infrastructure.  BABA requires that all steel, iron, construction materials, and manufactured products used in such products be “produced in the United States.”  BABA also discourages the use of general applicability waivers like FHWA’s Manufactured Products Waiver and required review of existing waivers. 

FHWA sought comments on its longstanding manufactured products waiver in March 2023 and received over 9,400 comments from the public.  Commenters included manufacturers, labor organizations, construction contractors, industry associations, State departments of transportation, and even members of Congress.  Based on a consideration of this feedback and in recognition of other domestic content policies, including Executive Order 14005, “Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America’s Workers,” FHWA is proposing to discontinue its Manufactured Products Waiver and modify its regulations to include domestic content requirements for manufactured products.

Continue Reading Federal Highway Administration Announces Proposed Rule Ending Longstanding Buy America Waiver for Manufactured Products

On May 12, 2023, the Department of Treasury issued long-awaited guidance addressing the so-called domestic content “bonus credit” available under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”).  As we have discussed elsewhere in detail, the IRA incorporates extensions of the existing clean energy tax credits under IRC section 45 and section 48 and establishes new “technology neutral” versions of these credits (pursuant to sections 45Y and 48E) that will become available starting in 2025.  At the same time, the IRA also establishes a new 10% domestic content bonus credit that may be claimed in combination with these tax credits provided that the taxpayer: (1) uses U.S.-made iron and steel during construction of the energy-generation facility; and (2) ensures that the cost of any domestic manufactured products that are components of the facility meets a specified domestic content threshold.

The IRA statutory provision left open several key questions regarding how these domestic content requirements would work in practice (including, for example, how the threshold percentage would be calculated).  Last Friday, Treasury issued long-awaited guidance (Notice 2023-38 or the “Notice”) that, among other things, addresses: (1) the contours of the “iron and steel” requirement; and (2) the method by which the adjusted percentage is to be calculated.  While the guidance is consistent with traditional Buy America principles in certain respects, it also introduces both new concepts and new terminology — particularly with regards to the domestic content percentage calculation — which we discuss in detail below. 

Continue Reading Treasury Releases Long-Awaited Guidance for Domestic Content Bonus Credit Under Inflation Reduction Act