As we previously covered, on March 26, 2026, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14398, “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors,” to address “racially discriminatory DEI activities” in federal contracting. Among other things, EO 14398 directed the FAR Council to issue deviation and interim guidance within 60 days to implement the new contract clause set forth in Section 3 of the EO. On April 20, the FAR Council issued those model deviations[1] ahead of schedule, along with corresponding implementation guidance.
Continue Reading Revolutionary FAR Overhaul Incorporates New “Addressing DEI Discrimination” Executive Order ProvisionsExecutive Order
New “Addressing DEI Discrimination” Executive Order: What Federal Contractors Need to Know
On March 26, 2026, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) titled “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors,” the latest in a series of Executive Orders and related actions by the Administration targeting what it views as unlawful Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (“DEI”) related practices. Most notable about…
Continue Reading New “Addressing DEI Discrimination” Executive Order: What Federal Contractors Need to Know“Adjusting Certain Delegations”: New Executive Order Aims to Streamline and Clarify Delegated Authorities Under the Defense Production Act
On March 13, 2026, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) titled “Adjusting Certain Delegations Under the Defense Production Act.” As we have covered in prior blog posts, the Defense Production Act (DPA) has traditionally been considered the primary federal means to manage and support defense production. …
Continue Reading “Adjusting Certain Delegations”: New Executive Order Aims to Streamline and Clarify Delegated Authorities Under the Defense Production ActTariff Takedown: Implications of Tariff Refunds for Government Contractors
On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court struck down an extensive series of tariffs imposed last year by President Trump, holding that they were not authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). And on March 4, 2026, the United States Court of International Trade began the process of refunding certain of “the millions of entries that were subject to IEEPA,” through a process known in the international trade context as liquidating.
These recent decisions by the Supreme Court and Court of International Trade may prompt federal contractors to consider seeking refunds of tariffs paid to import goods required to perform under their government contracts. As we covered in a previous post, government contracts may contain clauses allowing for price increases following the imposition of a new federal tax. These clauses can also work the other way and require a price decrease (or a credit to the Government under a cost-reimbursement contract) in the event of an after-relieved tax.
Continue Reading Tariff Takedown: Implications of Tariff Refunds for Government ContractorsGSA Proposes New SAM Certification Language for Federal Funding Recipients Addressing DEI, Immigration, and National Security
On February 18, 2026, the General Services Administration (“GSA”) issued a proposed revision to the certifications that federal financial assistance recipients or applicants must make in order to register in the System for Award Management (“SAM”), adding certifications related to diversity, equity, and inclusion programs; immigration; and national security. The proposed revision also addresses applicability in the event of an active injunction. Public comment is due by March 30, 2026.
Continue Reading GSA Proposes New SAM Certification Language for Federal Funding Recipients Addressing DEI, Immigration, and National SecurityAugust, September, and October 2025 Cybersecurity Developments Under the Trump Administration
This is the seventh blog in a series of Covington blogs on cybersecurity policies, executive orders (“EOs”), and other actions of the Trump Administration. The sixth blog is available here and our initial blog is available here. This blog describes key cybersecurity developments that took place in August, September…
Continue Reading August, September, and October 2025 Cybersecurity Developments Under the Trump AdministrationOverhauling the GSA Schedule
On October 17, 2025, the General Services Administration (“GSA”) announced that it plans to issue a Mass Modification to GSA’s Multiple Award Schedule (“MAS” or “Schedule”) Solicitation[1] and Schedule contracts in November 2025 (“Refresh”). Periodically, GSA may issue a Mass Modification to Schedule contracts to uniformly impose changes to the contract terms applicable to all Schedule contract holders, often as a result of changes in applicable law, regulation, or policy. This approach also ensures that existing Schedule contracts have consistent terms, even though with the evergreen nature of the Solicitation those contracts have been entered into at different times and are at different stages of performance.
This Refresh (i.e., Refresh #30) will implement several significant changes with the goal to align the GSA Schedule with recent developments in the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (“RFO”).[2] Although the full text of the Refresh is not yet available, GSA’s Refresh outline provides insight into the changes that are to come as GSA seeks to gain implementation experience with the RFO clauses, provisions, and ordering procedures through its Schedule contracts. Given GSA’s leadership of the RFO process, and this year’s Executive Order to consolidate domestic procurement of common goods and services in GSA to the extent permitted by law,[3] it is no surprise that it has acted quickly to revise its long-term government-wide contracting vehicle according to these recent developments.
Along with the Refresh announcement, GSA opened a 10 business day comment window on buy.gsa.gov, which we expect will close on October 31, 2025. Schedules contractors will be expected to accept the Refresh no later than 90 days from its release which is expected sometime in November. Below we discuss relevant background on the RFO process as it relates to the Schedule and anticipated changes to provisions and clauses in the Refresh. We will continue to watch for updates as GSA’s implementation of the RFO unfolds.
Continue Reading Overhauling the GSA Schedule
To Efficiency and Beyond?: President Trump Issues Executive Order to Enable a Competitive Space Launch Market
On August 13, 2025, the White House issued Executive Order 14335, “Enabling Competition in the Commercial Space Industry” (“EO 14335” or the “EO”). Framed as a push to “enhance American greatness by enabling a competitive launch marketplace and substantially increasing commercial space launch cadence and novel space activities by 2030,” EO 14335 directs federal agencies to reform regulatory barriers in four key areas: (1) commercial launch and reentry, (2) spaceport infrastructure, (3) novel space activity authorization, and (4) leadership and accountability. Sec. 2. Each of these initiatives aims to streamline bureaucracy, reduce delays, and accelerate U.S. commercial space growth. Below, we break down the EO’s provisions in each area and examine their significance for industry stakeholders.
Continue Reading To Efficiency and Beyond?: President Trump Issues Executive Order to Enable a Competitive Space Launch MarketJuly 2025 AI Developments Under the Trump Administration
This is part of an ongoing series of Covington blogs on the AI policies, executive orders, and other actions of the Trump Administration. This blog describes AI actions taken by the Trump Administration in July 2025, and prior articles in this series are available here.
White House Issues AI…
Continue Reading July 2025 AI Developments Under the Trump AdministrationWhite House Issues Executive Order Focused on “Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking”
On August 7, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14332, “Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking,” (“EO 14332” or “the EO”) to “strengthen oversight and coordination of, and to streamline, agency grantmaking” and “ensure greater accountability for use of public funds.” Sec. 1. Among other things, the EO: (1) directs agencies to review discretionary funding opportunities for consistency with agency priorities; (2) provides principles for agencies to use in assessing discretionary awards; (3) directs the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) to revise the Uniform Guidance applicable to federal financial assistance; and (4) requires agencies to include terms and conditions in their discretionary grant agreements allowing for termination for convenience and preventing recipients from drawing down funds without prior written explanation and approval. Through these methods, EO 14332 focuses on increased political oversight of discretionary funding, ensuring broad termination for convenience rights, and limiting indirect costs. The EO arrives at the intersection of recent efforts by the Trump Administration both to cancel, terminate, or otherwise pause federal funding viewed as inconsistent with the Administration’s policy priorities and to streamline federal procurement regulations.
Continue Reading White House Issues Executive Order Focused on “Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking”