Over one year ago, on May 2, 2025, the FAR Council took the first concrete step in the administration’s “Revolutionary FAR Overhaul” (“RFO”) initiative by issuing the initial round of rolling model deviation guidance—a deliberate move to translate reform of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) from an abstract policy goal into acquisition text. That moment marked the beginning of a new implementation reality: rather than waiting for a single, comprehensive rulemaking, the government began operationalizing the overhaul in increments, part by part, through deviations. Now, a year later, the question for contractors is no longer whether the overhaul is “coming,” but how it is being implemented across agencies and systems. This is therefore a good time to take stock of where implementation stands, where friction is emerging, and what sophisticated contractors can do to stay ahead of the curve. For additional information, our prior coverage of the RFO roll-out can be found here and here.
Continue Reading From Paper Reform to Practice: How Agencies Are Actually Implementing the Revolutionary FAR OverhaulProcurement
The New Executive Order on “Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting”: What Federal Contractors Need to Know
By Jay Carey, Kayleigh Scalzo & Darby Rourick on
Posted in Procurement Policy, Procurement Reform
On April 30, 2026, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) titled, “Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting.” This EO directs agencies to make fixed-price contracts the default form of contracting, and requires agency officials to execute written justifications to use other forms of contracting. Of particular note for large contractors, the EO directs that, “[w]ithin 90 days of the date of this order, each agency head shall review and, to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with law, seek to modify, restructure, or renegotiate its 10 largest non-fixed-price contracts by dollar value . . . to facilitate use of fixed prices and performance-based incentives for contract deliverables to the maximum extent practicable.”
Continue Reading The New Executive Order on “Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting”: What Federal Contractors Need to KnowFraud Prevention in Focus: Examining DOD’s Risk Management Strategies
The Department of Defense (“DOD”) is responsible for almost half of the federal government’s discretionary spending and spends more on contracting than all other federal agencies combined, obligating about $445 billion in fiscal year 2024. Given the renewed focus on fraud detection and prevention across the U.S. government – as highlighted both by the efforts of the Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”) and by recent congressional committee hearings focused on reducing waste, fraud, and abuse – the issue of fraud in DOD has become increasingly relevant.
On June 4, 2025, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s Subcommittee on Government Operations held a hearing titled “Safeguarding Procurement: Examining Fraud Risk Management in the Department of Defense,” during which congressional members examined strategies to combat fraud in DOD – including procurement fraud – and the steps the department is taking to address the problem.
Continue Reading Fraud Prevention in Focus: Examining DOD’s Risk Management StrategiesChips on the Table: FAR Council Releases Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Prohibition on Purchase and Use of Certain Semiconductors
Today, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (“FAR Council”) released an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “ANPRM”) describing the agencies’ plan to implement Section 5949 of the National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) for FY 23 (Pub. L. 117-263).
Section 5949 prohibits the Federal Government from procuring certain semiconductor parts, products, or services traceable to named Chinese companies and potentially other foreign countries of concern. To that end, the ANPRM invites public comment on the proposed contents of an implementing FAR clause, to take effect December 23, 2027.
As discussed below, the FAR Council proposed applying the regulations broadly to all solicitations and contracts, including commercial item and commercially available off-the-shelf (“COTS”) contracts, subject only to a limited waiver. Although not set out in the statute, the clause would require contractors to conduct a “reasonable inquiry” into their supply chain to detect potential violations. It would also require both disclosure and the taking of corrective action in the event that nonconforming products or services are discovered.
More details are below, and our previous coverage of Section 5949 is available here.
Continue Reading Chips on the Table: FAR Council Releases Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Prohibition on Purchase and Use of Certain SemiconductorsLowest Priced Technically Acceptable Procurements Are Less and Less Acceptable: Proposed FAR Rule Further Continues Shake-Up of LPTA Procurements
On October 2, 2019, the Department of Defense, General Services Administration, and NASA issued a proposed rule that would amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation to establish new restrictions on when and under what circumstances civilian agencies may employ Lowest Price Technically Acceptable source selection procedures. The proposed rule would implement Section 880 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, and follows hot on the heels of DoD’s final rule making similar — but not identical — amendments to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. (See our recent blog post on the new DFARS rule.)
Continue Reading Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable Procurements Are Less and Less Acceptable: Proposed FAR Rule Further Continues Shake-Up of LPTA Procurements
After the Final Report: Expectations Following the Section 809 Panel’s Third Volume of Acquisition Policy Reforms
Posted on
The Section 809 Panel recently concluded its monumental analysis of defense acquisition law and regulations and released its third volume of recommended changes. As we have written previously, the Panel’s work stands out from previous acquisition reform efforts with the appendices of detailed legislative and regulatory changes that accompany the commissioners’ analysis and recommendations.
Given the scope of the Panel’s work, few believe that Congress or the Department of Defense (“DoD”) will — or even could — simply adopt the recommendations in full. Legislative bandwidth for additional acquisition reform is finite, and some of the Panel’s recommendations will prompt robust debate. In this post, we analyze some of the recommendations that government contractors should follow most closely. We highlight key issues and address the political dynamics involved in enacting them.
Continue Reading After the Final Report: Expectations Following the Section 809 Panel’s Third Volume of Acquisition Policy Reforms