On March 26, 2026, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) titled “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors,” the latest in a series of Executive Orders and related actions by the Administration targeting what it views as unlawful Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (“DEI”) related practices. Most notable about
Continue Reading New “Addressing DEI Discrimination” Executive Order: What Federal Contractors Need to KnowFAR
Overhauling the GSA Schedule
On October 17, 2025, the General Services Administration (“GSA”) announced that it plans to issue a Mass Modification to GSA’s Multiple Award Schedule (“MAS” or “Schedule”) Solicitation[1] and Schedule contracts in November 2025 (“Refresh”). Periodically, GSA may issue a Mass Modification to Schedule contracts to uniformly impose changes to the contract terms applicable to all Schedule contract holders, often as a result of changes in applicable law, regulation, or policy. This approach also ensures that existing Schedule contracts have consistent terms, even though with the evergreen nature of the Solicitation those contracts have been entered into at different times and are at different stages of performance.
This Refresh (i.e., Refresh #30) will implement several significant changes with the goal to align the GSA Schedule with recent developments in the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (“RFO”).[2] Although the full text of the Refresh is not yet available, GSA’s Refresh outline provides insight into the changes that are to come as GSA seeks to gain implementation experience with the RFO clauses, provisions, and ordering procedures through its Schedule contracts. Given GSA’s leadership of the RFO process, and this year’s Executive Order to consolidate domestic procurement of common goods and services in GSA to the extent permitted by law,[3] it is no surprise that it has acted quickly to revise its long-term government-wide contracting vehicle according to these recent developments.
Along with the Refresh announcement, GSA opened a 10 business day comment window on buy.gsa.gov, which we expect will close on October 31, 2025. Schedules contractors will be expected to accept the Refresh no later than 90 days from its release which is expected sometime in November. Below we discuss relevant background on the RFO process as it relates to the Schedule and anticipated changes to provisions and clauses in the Refresh. We will continue to watch for updates as GSA’s implementation of the RFO unfolds.
Continue Reading Overhauling the GSA ScheduleE-Verify and the False Claims Act: An Emerging Tool in Immigration Enforcement
On September 18, 2025, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a civil False Claims Act (“FCA”) settlement against a New Jersey shipbuilder to resolve allegations that it improperly employed unauthorized workers to work on Navy ships. The settlement, which exceeded $4 million, is the second this year involving government contractors alleged to have employed unauthorized workers in violation of FAR 52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification. With immigration enforcement squarely at the center of the current administration’s domestic agenda, government contractors should be mindful of this enforcement theory and take appropriate steps to ensure compliance and protect themselves from a costly FCA claim.
Continue Reading E-Verify and the False Claims Act: An Emerging Tool in Immigration EnforcementContinued Signs of Progress in the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul
Since President Trump issued Executive Order (“E.O.”) 14275, “Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement” on April 15, 2025 as part of an effort to remake Federal procurement, the Administration has undertaken a variety of initial steps to implement its so-called “Revolutionary FAR Overhaul” (“RFO”). These steps include “streamlining” each Part of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) on a rolling basis to remove “non-statutory requirements.” To date, seven streamlined FAR Parts have been released on the RFO page of acquisition.gov: Parts 1, Federal Acquisition Regulation; 10, Market Research; 11, Describing Agency Needs; 18, Emergency Acquisitions; 34, Major System Acquisition; 39, Acquisition of Information and Communication Technology; and 43, Contract Modifications. The public has the opportunity to provide “informal input” for each Part—the soonest of which is to provide feedback on FAR Part 10 by July 7, 2025 at 4:30 PM ET.[1] Although the volume of streamlined FAR Parts, non-regulatory resources, and commentary on acquisition.gov has started to proliferate in recent weeks, the extent to which these resources can and will be relied on in a strategic, accessible manner by the broader acquisition community still remains to be seen.
Continue Reading Continued Signs of Progress in the Revolutionary FAR OverhaulEarly Signs of Progress in the “Revolutionary FAR Overhaul”
On Friday, May 2, the U.S. government announced further steps in its much-discussed plan to re-write the FAR by establishing a “Revolutionary FAR Overhaul” (“RFO”) website on Acquisition.gov, issuing written guidance to federal agencies, and releasing proposed revisions to FAR Part 1 – Federal Acquisition Regulation System and Part 34 – Major System Acquisition. This activity comes on the heels of recent presidential directives requiring agencies to examine and reform their approach to procurement of goods and services, including Executive Order (“E.O.”) 14275, “Restoring Common Sense To Federal Procurement,” and E.O. 14271, “Ensuring Commercial, Cost-Effective Solutions in Federal Contracts.”
As anticipated, the FAR re-write is spearheaded by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (“OFPP”) within the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (“FAR Council”). The RFO website proclaims that the re-write is “the first-ever comprehensive overhaul of the FAR” and aims to “return the FAR to its statutory roots, rewritten in plain language, and remove most non-statutory rules.” It also will result in “non-regulatory buying guides [to] provide practical strategies grounded in common sense while remaining outside the FAR.” In short, the goal is characterized as “faster acquisitions, greater competition, and better results.”
Continue Reading Early Signs of Progress in the “Revolutionary FAR Overhaul”Executive Order Issued To Expand GSA’s Role in Acquisition of “Common Goods and Services” and Information Technology
On March 20, 2025, President Trump issued executive order (“EO”) Eliminating Waste and Saving Taxpayer Dollars by Consolidating Procurement, which will have significant effects on federal government contracting. The EO is intended to consolidate “domestic Federal procurement” within the General Services Administration (“GSA”) to “eliminate waste and duplication.”
The EO has two primary objectives:
- It grants GSA an increased role in the U.S. Government’s acquisition of “common goods and services”.
- It designates the GSA Administrator as “the executive agent for all Government-wide acquisition contracts for information technology” pursuant to 40 U.S.C. § 11302(e).[1]
We have summarized key provisions and potential effects of the EO further below.
Continue Reading Executive Order Issued To Expand GSA’s Role in Acquisition of “Common Goods and Services” and Information TechnologyThe Trump Tariffs and Federal Contractors: In These Taxing Times, Contractors Have a Duty To Know These Five Things
As reported and analyzed in recent posts, the Trump administration has begun implementing a number of new tariffs, including three sets of country-based tariffs (China, Canada, and Mexico) and Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum. We expect further announcements of reciprocal tariffs on imports from China, Canada, and Mexico, and other tariffs on specific items including lumber, semiconductors, and agricultural products. These tariffs raise significant concerns for government contractors. We have outlined below five points government contractors should keep in mind when assessing the impact of these tariffs on their contracts.
Continue Reading The Trump Tariffs and Federal Contractors: In These Taxing Times, Contractors Have a Duty To Know These Five ThingsFAR Council Proposes New FAR CUI Rule
On January 15, 2025, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) Council proposed a new FAR Controlled Unclassified Information (“CUI”) rule (“proposed rule”) to establish uniform requirements for handling CUI with broad applicability to solicitations and contracts across the federal government.
The proposed rule, in development for roughly a decade, represents a…
Continue Reading FAR Council Proposes New FAR CUI RuleThe Proposed FAR Rule on OCIs: Big Changes May Be Coming
Yesterday, the FAR Council issued a proposed rule that would update the U.S. Government’s approach to organizational conflicts of interest (OCIs). While the proposed rule is not finalized and may change in response to forthcoming comments from interested parties, the proposed rule contemplates major changes to the FAR’s existing framework in this area. In this post, we summarize the background leading up to the proposed rule and highlight key areas of proposed change.
Background
Continue Reading The Proposed FAR Rule on OCIs: Big Changes May Be ComingTrade Agreements Act Certifications Undergo New Scrutiny
GAO’s recent protest decision in HPI Federal, LLC, B-422583, Aug. 9, 2024, 2024 WL 3823852, highlights the importance of making clear and precise Trade Agreements Act (TAA) compliance certifications when offering products for sale to the U.S. Government.
- On the one hand, GAO found that it was unreasonable for an agency to accept an offeror’s certification that certain of its products were “assembled in” a TAA-compliant country as evidence of the product’s TAA compliance. GAO reasoned that the referenced assembly — which was not described in the proposal — may not satisfy the TAA’s requirement for “substantial transformation” in that country.
- In contrast, GAO found that it was reasonable for the agency to accept the same offeror’s certification that other products had a TAA-compliant “country of origin”.
As these contrasting examples show, offerors should take care to ensure that their certifications are adequate to establish TAA compliance. A certification falling short of that standard could place an award at risk, and could even render an offeror ineligible for award.
Continue Reading Trade Agreements Act Certifications Undergo New Scrutiny