This is the second blog in a series of Covington blogs on cybersecurity policies, executive orders (“EOs”), and other actions of the new Trump Administration.  This blog describes key cybersecurity developments that took place in March 2025. 

Trump Administration Executive Order on Achieving Efficiency

On March 19, 2025, the Trump Administration released an EO entitled “Achieving Efficiency Through State and Local Preparedness”.  The EO shifts the focus to state and local government to prepare for cyber-attacks and extreme weather, launches a National Resilience Strategy, and “calls for a review of all infrastructure, continuity, and preparedness policies to modernize and simplify federal approaches, aligning them with the National Resilience Strategy.”  This includes reviewing a number of specific EOs from the Biden Administration and earlier.  The EO also creates a National Risk Register to track risks to national infrastructure and prioritize focus and spending.


The stated premise of the EO is that “commonsense approaches and investments by State and local governments across American infrastructure will enhance national security.”  The EO explains that the most effective preparation comes from the State and local governments and allows citizens to benefit more immediately, suggesting that State and local governments are better positioned to anticipate needs and address unique impacts of cyber-attacks or other emergencies within local communities.  In addition, the EO emphasizes efficiency and reducing taxpayer burden by providing specific cuts to federal government responsibilities.  The policy overview does not provide details on how or if the federal government will support state and local governments after shifting disaster preparedness and response.

The EO mandates specific federal policy changes.  The EO requires that the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (“APNSA”) develop a “National Resilience Strategy” within 90 days, which will be reviewed and updated at least every four years.  Additionally, the APANSA is charged with reviewing and recommending revisions, recissions and replacements of all policies related to Critical Infrastructure, including National Security memorandum and EOs related to Supply Chain Resilience, Critical Infrastructure, federal preparedness and response to events and natural disasters, and food and agriculture resilience.  Notably, the list of policies to review and revise includes the National Security Memorandum 22 of April 30, 2024, which in conjunction with Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 (“CIRCIA”) establishes minimum resilience and security requirements and recommendations to build resilience into critical infrastructure; Executive Order 14017 of February 24, 2021 (America’s Supply Chains), which includes oversight for critical sectors and information and communications technology, including the industrial base for the development of ICT software, data, and associated services; and Executive Order 14123 of June 14, 2024 (White House Council on Supply Chain Resilience), among others.[1] 

Finally, as noted above, the EO requires that the APANSA establish a “National Risk Register”  to quantify natural and malign risks to national infrastructure, which will then be “used to inform the Intelligence Community, private sector investments, State investments, and Federal budget priorities.”

The EO does not elaborate, but the Fact Sheet released in conjunction with the EO explains that the review of these federal policies is aimed at “shifting national critical infrastructure policy from an “all-hazards” approach to a risk-informed approach, prioritizing resilience and action over mere information sharing.” 

This EO represents a departure from the approach of prior administrations of centralizing cybersecurity risk mitigation and response in the federal government, and could result in differing approaches by state and local governments to meet these obligations, depending on policy approaches and funding and resourcing available.  Additional details have yet to be provided on funding or resources for state and local governments that may face challenges identifying, assessing, and addressing cyber risks effectively without the Intelligence Community resources.

GSA Establishes FedRAMP 20x Initiative

On March 24, 2025, GSA announced the FedRAMP 20X initiative.  This program seeks to modernize FedRAMP by making it easier for companies to obtain and maintain FedRAMP authorizations.  As described by GSA, the intent would be to significantly reduce the amount of time that is required to obtain a FedRAMP authorization from months or even years to weeks.  Initially, the program would focus on certain SaaS offerings that are hosted on existing FedRAMP authorized infrastructure, and would accomplish the objectives of rapid authorization through a number of key steps.  One notable goal is to eliminate documentation requirements for the majority of FedRAMP Moderate controls (80% in total) and to replace documentation with automated validation.  The initiative does not explain how this validation would occur.  Another key element of the initiative is to increase reliance on existing industry certifications (e.g., ISO certificates) to avoid the need for reassessment of the same technical processes that may have been validated as part of those certifications.  Finally, the program would move towards an automated process for continuous monitoring rather than a manual process that involves annual assessments.  The specific timing of implementation of these goals is unclear, but GSA has created several industry working groups to discuss approaches for achieving the goals.


[1] Other listed policies for review include National Security Memorandum 32 of January 19, 2025 (National Continuity Policy); Executive Order 14146 of January 19, 2025 (Partial Revocation of Executive Order 13961); Executive Order 12656 of November 18, 1988 (Assignment of Emergency Preparedness Responsibilities); Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 of February 28, 2003 (Management of Domestic Incidents); Presidential Policy Directive 8 of March 30, 2011 (National Preparedness); Presidential Policy Directive 22 of March 28, 2013 (National Special Security Events); and Presidential Policy Directive 44 of November 7, 2016 (Enhancing Domestic Incident Response).

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Susan B. Cassidy Susan B. Cassidy

Susan Cassidy co-chairs Covington’s Aerospace and Defense Industry Group, and has been advising government contractors for more than 35 years on the requirements imposed on companies contracting with the U.S. Government.

Susan’s practice focuses on the intersection of cybersecurity, national security, and supply…

Susan Cassidy co-chairs Covington’s Aerospace and Defense Industry Group, and has been advising government contractors for more than 35 years on the requirements imposed on companies contracting with the U.S. Government.

Susan’s practice focuses on the intersection of cybersecurity, national security, and supply chain risk management for companies that sell products and services to the U.S. Government. Susan advises contractors at all phases of the procurement cycle, and regularly:

advises clients on compliance obligations imposed by the FAR, DFARS, and other agency regulatory requirements;
leads internal and government False Claims Act (FCA) investigations addressing allegations of violations of government cybersecurity, national security, supply chain, quality, and MIL-SPEC requirements; and
advises clients who have suffered a cyber breach where U.S. government information may have been impacted.

In her work with global, national, and start-up contractors, Susan advises companies on all aspects of government supply chain issues including:

Government cybersecurity requirements, including the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), DFARS 252.204-7012, FedRAMP, controlled unclassified information (CUI), and NIST SP 800-171 requirements;
Evolving sourcing issues such as Section 889, counterfeit part requirements, Section 5949 semiconductor product and service restrictions, and limitations on sourcing a variety of products from China; and
Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC) regulations and product exclusions.

 

Susan previously served as senior in-house counsel for two major defense contractors (Northrop Grumman Corporation and Motorola Incorporated) and is Chambers rated in both Government Contracts and Government Contracts Cybersecurity. Chambers USA has quoted sources stating that “Susan’s in-house experience coupled with her deep understanding of the regulatory requirements is the perfect balance to navigate legal and commercial matters.”

Susan is a former Public Contract Law Procurement Division Co-Chair, former Co-Chair and current Vice-Chair of the ABA PCL Cybersecurity, Privacy and Emerging Technology Committee.

Susan’s pro-bono work extends to assisting veterans in a variety of matters, as well as providing advice to elderly clients on their wills and other end-of-life planning documents.

Photo of Ashden Fein Ashden Fein

Ashden Fein is a vice chair of the firm’s global Cybersecurity practice. He advises clients on cybersecurity and national security matters, including crisis management and incident response, risk management and governance, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

For cybersecurity matters, Ashden counsels…

Ashden Fein is a vice chair of the firm’s global Cybersecurity practice. He advises clients on cybersecurity and national security matters, including crisis management and incident response, risk management and governance, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

For cybersecurity matters, Ashden counsels clients on preparing for and responding to cyber-based attacks, assessing security controls and practices for the protection of data and systems, developing and implementing cybersecurity risk management and governance programs, and complying with federal and state regulatory requirements. Ashden frequently supports clients as the lead investigator and crisis manager for global cyber and data security incidents, including data breaches involving personal data, advanced persistent threats targeting intellectual property across industries, state-sponsored theft of sensitive U.S. government information, extortion and ransomware, and destructive attacks.

Additionally, Ashden assists clients from across industries with leading internal investigations and responding to government inquiries related to the U.S. national security and insider risks. He also advises aerospace, defense, and intelligence contractors on security compliance under U.S. national security laws and regulations including, among others, the National Industrial Security Program (NISPOM), U.S. government cybersecurity regulations, FedRAMP, and requirements related to supply chain security.

Before joining Covington, Ashden served on active duty in the U.S. Army as a Military Intelligence officer and prosecutor specializing in cybercrime and national security investigations and prosecutions — to include serving as the lead trial lawyer in the prosecution of Private Chelsea (Bradley) Manning for the unlawful disclosure of classified information to Wikileaks. Ashden is a retired U.S. Army officer.

Photo of Robert Huffman Robert Huffman

Bob Huffman counsels government contractors on emerging technology issues, including artificial intelligence (AI), cybersecurity, and software supply chain security, that are currently affecting federal and state procurement. His areas of expertise include the Department of Defense (DOD) and other agency acquisition regulations governing…

Bob Huffman counsels government contractors on emerging technology issues, including artificial intelligence (AI), cybersecurity, and software supply chain security, that are currently affecting federal and state procurement. His areas of expertise include the Department of Defense (DOD) and other agency acquisition regulations governing information security and the reporting of cyber incidents, the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program, the requirements for secure software development self-attestations and bills of materials (SBOMs) emanating from the May 2021 Executive Order on Cybersecurity, and the various requirements for responsible AI procurement, safety, and testing currently being implemented under President Trump’s AI Executive Order. 

Bob also represents contractors in False Claims Act (FCA) litigation and investigations involving cybersecurity and other technology compliance issues, as well more traditional government contracting costs, quality, and regulatory compliance issues. These investigations include significant parallel civil/criminal proceedings growing out of the Department of Justice’s Cyber Fraud Initiative. They also include investigations resulting from False Claims Act qui tam lawsuits and other enforcement proceedings. Bob has represented clients in over a dozen FCA qui tam suits.

Bob also regularly counsels clients on government contracting supply chain compliance issues, including those arising under the Buy American Act/Trade Agreements Act and Section 889 of the FY2019 National Defense Authorization Act. In addition, Bob advises government contractors on rules relating to IP, including government patent rights, technical data rights, rights in computer software, and the rules applicable to IP in the acquisition of commercial products, services, and software. He focuses this aspect of his practice on the overlap of these traditional government contracts IP rules with the IP issues associated with the acquisition of AI services and the data needed to train the large learning models on which those services are based. 

Bob is ranked by Chambers USA for his work in government contracts and he writes extensively in the areas of procurement-related AI, cybersecurity, software security, and supply chain regulation. He also teaches a course at Georgetown Law School that focuses on the technology, supply chain, and national security issues associated with energy and climate change.

Photo of Ryan Burnette Ryan Burnette

Ryan Burnette is a government contracts and technology-focused lawyer that advises on federal contracting compliance requirements and on government and internal investigations that stem from these obligations. Ryan has particular experience with defense and intelligence contracting, as well as with cybersecurity, supply chain…

Ryan Burnette is a government contracts and technology-focused lawyer that advises on federal contracting compliance requirements and on government and internal investigations that stem from these obligations. Ryan has particular experience with defense and intelligence contracting, as well as with cybersecurity, supply chain, artificial intelligence, and software development requirements.

Ryan also advises on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) compliance, public policy matters, agency disputes, and government cost accounting, drawing on his prior experience in providing overall direction for the federal contracting system to offer insight on the practical implications of regulations. He has assisted industry clients with the resolution of complex civil and criminal investigations by the Department of Justice, and he regularly speaks and writes on government contracts, cybersecurity, national security, and emerging technology topics.

Ryan is especially experienced with:

Government cybersecurity standards, including the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP); DFARS 252.204-7012, DFARS 252.204-7020, and other agency cybersecurity requirements; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) publications, such as NIST SP 800-171; and the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program.
Software and artificial intelligence (AI) requirements, including federal secure software development frameworks and software security attestations; software bill of materials requirements; and current and forthcoming AI data disclosure, validation, and configuration requirements, including unique requirements that are applicable to the use of large language models (LLMs) and dual use foundation models.
Supply chain requirements, including Section 889 of the FY19 National Defense Authorization Act; restrictions on covered semiconductors and printed circuit boards; Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS) restrictions; and federal exclusionary authorities, such as matters relating to the Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC).
Information handling, marking, and dissemination requirements, including those relating to Covered Defense Information (CDI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).
Federal Cost Accounting Standards and FAR Part 31 allocation and reimbursement requirements.

Prior to joining Covington, Ryan served in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in the Executive Office of the President, where he focused on the development and implementation of government-wide contracting regulations and administrative actions affecting more than $400 billion dollars’ worth of goods and services each year.  While in government, Ryan helped develop several contracting-related Executive Orders, and worked with White House and agency officials on regulatory and policy matters affecting contractor disclosure and agency responsibility determinations, labor and employment issues, IT contracting, commercial item acquisitions, performance contracting, schedule contracting and interagency acquisitions, competition requirements, and suspension and debarment, among others.  Additionally, Ryan was selected to serve on a core team that led reform of security processes affecting federal background investigations for cleared federal employees and contractors in the wake of significant issues affecting the program.  These efforts resulted in the establishment of a semi-autonomous U.S. Government agency to conduct and manage background investigations.

Photo of Darby Rourick Darby Rourick

Darby Rourick is a government contracts lawyer that advises on federal contracting compliance requirements and on government and internal investigations that stem from these obligations. She has particular experience in federal cybersecurity and information technology supply chain issues. Darby has an active investigations…

Darby Rourick is a government contracts lawyer that advises on federal contracting compliance requirements and on government and internal investigations that stem from these obligations. She has particular experience in federal cybersecurity and information technology supply chain issues. Darby has an active investigations practice and advises contractors when faced with cyber incidents involving government information, as well as representing contractors facing allegations of cyber fraud under the False Claims Act. She also counsels clients on cybersecurity incident response; compliance with federal cybersecurity laws, regulations, and standards; supplier and subcontractor security issues; and cybersecurity related investigations.

Darby has particular regulatory experience with:

Government cybersecurity supply chain issues like the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), DFARS 7012, and NIST SP 800-171 requirements; and
Information handling, marking, and dissemination requirements, including those relating to Covered Defense Information (CDI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

She also assist clients when allegations of non-compliance arise with procurement requirements, such as in the following areas:

Procurement fraud and FAR mandatory disclosure requirements;
Allegations of violations of cybersecurity regulation;
Cyber incidents and data spills; and 
Compliance with MIL-SPEC requirements, the Qualified Products List, and other sourcing obligations.

Photo of Krissy Chapman Krissy Chapman

Kristen “Krissy” Chapman is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. She represents and advises clients on a range of cybersecurity, data privacy, and government contracts issues, including cyber and data security incident response and preparedness, cross-border privacy law, government and internal…

Kristen “Krissy” Chapman is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. She represents and advises clients on a range of cybersecurity, data privacy, and government contracts issues, including cyber and data security incident response and preparedness, cross-border privacy law, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

Prior to joining the firm, Krissy served as a consultant in both the private and public sectors, advising clients across a range of industries, including transportation and infrastructure, life sciences and healthcare, and national security.