On March 12, 2024, the Department of Defense (DoD) published a final rule, revising the eligibility criteria for the voluntary DoD Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cybersecurity (CS) Activities Program.  The intent of the rule is to permit all defense contractors that own or operate unclassified information systems that process, store, or transmit covered defense information to participate in the program.  Previously, only cleared contractors were permitted to participate in the sharing of this information.  The final rule also amends identity proofing requirements by eliminating the need to obtain a medium security certificate to participate in either the voluntary or mandatory reporting regimes.  The rule will take effect on April 11, 2024, and DoD anticipates a significant increase in contractor participation.

Additional information about the rule is outlined below.

Goals of the Program

The DIB CS Program aims to support contractor safeguarding of defense information by promoting the sharing of threat and mitigation strategies across Program participants.  The Program is intended to encourage the sharing of threat information to complement the mandatory obligations imposed on contractors through DFARS 252.204–7012.  Specific goals include establishing a broader voluntary framework for protecting confidential information and collectively working to maximize cybersecurity through cyber threat information sharing, expanded incident reporting, and mitigation strategy and malware analysis dissemination.  Contractors can benefit from the Program by receiving training, best practices, and Government Furnished Information.  Participants can also access the online platform, DIBNet, and the DoD Cyber Crime Center (DC3), which provide resources and enable threat information sharing across participants.

History of the Program

The DIB CS Program began as an interim 2012 rule that initially applied only to contractors who had the ability to safeguard classified information and were cleared with a facility security clearance to at least the Secret level.  In 2015, the Program expanded to include all cleared contractors – not just those with the ability to safeguard classified information.  The final rule notes that DoD has seen a steady increase in the percentage of defense contractors that are interested in participating but could not because they do not meet the eligibility requirements.  The 2024 update reaches more broadly, effectively expanding eligibility to all contractors covered under DoD’s mandatory reporting requirements.  This expansion also recognizes the increased reliance of DoD on commercial products in its supply chain and the need to provide those commercial contractors with the information they need to protect their systems and the products they provide to the Government.  Similarly, the expansion recognizes that smaller defense contractors (which were less likely to meet eligibility requirements) have fewer resources overall to devote to cybersecurity, and therefore may benefit from the information that is shared in the program.

Key Updates to the Final Rule

Due to increased interest in the Program, industry feedback to engage a broader cross-section of the community, and DoD’s desire to deliver increasingly tailored threat information, the updated rule expands eligibility and seeks to reduce the burden on contractors to participate.  First, DoD eliminated the prior requirement that participants maintain an existing active facility clearance to at least the Secret level.  (Contractors must still have the ability to safeguard classified information to receive any classified threat information electronically.)  The updated rule applies to any contractor that owns or operates a covered contractor information system (including those who handle unclassified information).  

Second, contractors no longer must obtain a medium assurance certificate and pay an associated fee to qualify for the Program.  Instead, in an effort to reduce the burden on contractors, the rule allows contractors to register with Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) to meet identity proofing requirements for both the voluntary and mandatory reporting programs.  Allowing the use of  PIEE to meet identity proofing requirements is helpful because all DoD contracts already include a requirement to register with PIEE to receive electronic payments. 

Third, DoD also clarified that a contractor may authorize a third-party service provider to report incidents on behalf of the contractor through a DIB CS Program Framework Agreement.  

What does this Mean for Contractors?

DoD anticipates that updates to the final rule will increase Program eligibility by an estimated 68,000 defense contractors, and approximately 8,000 more contractors will apply based on past participation statistics.  Contractors should benefit from this updated, final rule if they choose to participate through easier entry into the Program and more participants sharing information on cyber threats and mitigation strategies.  Faced with evolving and more sophisticated threat actors, DoD hopes to benefit from increased awareness and improved assessments of cyber incidents with data from a broader set of contractors and industries. 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Susan B. Cassidy Susan B. Cassidy

Susan is co-chair of the firm’s Aerospace and Defense Industry Group and is a partner in the firm’s Government Contracts and Cybersecurity Practice Groups. She previously served as in-house counsel for two major defense contractors and advises a broad range of government contractors…

Susan is co-chair of the firm’s Aerospace and Defense Industry Group and is a partner in the firm’s Government Contracts and Cybersecurity Practice Groups. She previously served as in-house counsel for two major defense contractors and advises a broad range of government contractors on compliance with FAR and DFARS requirements, with a special expertise in supply chain, cybersecurity and FedRAMP requirements. She has an active investigations practice and advises contractors when faced with cyber incidents involving government information, as well as representing contractors facing allegations of cyber fraud under the False Claims Act. Susan relies on her expertise and experience with the Defense Department and the Intelligence Community to help her clients navigate the complex regulatory intersection of cybersecurity, national security, and government contracts. She is Chambers rated in both Government Contracts and Government Contracts Cybersecurity. In 2023, Chambers USA quoted sources stating that “Susan’s in-house experience coupled with her deep understanding of the regulatory requirements is the perfect balance to navigate legal and commercial matters.”

Her clients range from new entrants into the federal procurement market to well established defense contractors and she provides compliance advices across a broad spectrum of procurement issues. Susan consistently remains at the forefront of legislative and regulatory changes in the procurement area, and in 2018, the National Law Review selected her as a “Go-to Thought Leader” on the topic of Cybersecurity for Government Contractors.

In her work with global, national, and start-up contractors, Susan advises companies on all aspects of government supply chain issues including:

  • Government cybersecurity requirements, including the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), DFARS 7012, and NIST SP 800-171 requirements,
  • Evolving sourcing issues such as Section 889, counterfeit part requirements, Section 5949 and limitations on sourcing from China
  • Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC) regulations and product exclusions,
  • Controlled unclassified information (CUI) obligations, and
  • M&A government cybersecurity due diligence.

Susan has an active internal investigations practice that assists clients when allegations of non-compliance arise with procurement requirements, such as in the following areas:

  • Procurement fraud and FAR mandatory disclosure requirements,
  • Cyber incidents and data spills involving sensitive government information,
  • Allegations of violations of national security requirements, and
  • Compliance with MIL-SPEC requirements, the Qualified Products List, and other sourcing obligations.

In addition to her counseling and investigatory practice, Susan has considerable litigation experience and has represented clients in bid protests, prime-subcontractor disputes, Administrative Procedure Act cases, and product liability litigation before federal courts, state courts, and administrative agencies.

Susan is a former Public Contract Law Procurement Division Co-Chair, former Co-Chair and current Vice-Chair of the ABA PCL Cybersecurity, Privacy and Emerging Technology Committee.

Prior to joining Covington, Susan served as in-house senior counsel at Northrop Grumman Corporation and Motorola Incorporated.

Photo of Ryan Burnette Ryan Burnette

Ryan Burnette is a government contracts and technology-focused lawyer that advises on federal contracting compliance requirements and on government and internal investigations that stem from these obligations. Ryan has particular experience with defense and intelligence contracting, as well as with cybersecurity, supply chain…

Ryan Burnette is a government contracts and technology-focused lawyer that advises on federal contracting compliance requirements and on government and internal investigations that stem from these obligations. Ryan has particular experience with defense and intelligence contracting, as well as with cybersecurity, supply chain, artificial intelligence, and software development requirements.

Ryan also advises on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) compliance, public policy matters, agency disputes, and government cost accounting, drawing on his prior experience in providing overall direction for the federal contracting system to offer insight on the practical implications of regulations. He has assisted industry clients with the resolution of complex civil and criminal investigations by the Department of Justice, and he regularly speaks and writes on government contracts, cybersecurity, national security, and emerging technology topics.

Ryan is especially experienced with:

  • Government cybersecurity standards, including the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP); DFARS 252.204-7012, DFARS 252.204-7020, and other agency cybersecurity requirements; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) publications, such as NIST SP 800-171; and the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program.
  • Software and artificial intelligence (AI) requirements, including federal secure software development frameworks and software security attestations; software bill of materials requirements; and current and forthcoming AI data disclosure, validation, and configuration requirements, including unique requirements that are applicable to the use of large language models (LLMs) and dual use foundation models.
  • Supply chain requirements, including Section 889 of the FY19 National Defense Authorization Act; restrictions on covered semiconductors and printed circuit boards; Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS) restrictions; and federal exclusionary authorities, such as matters relating to the Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC).
  • Information handling, marking, and dissemination requirements, including those relating to Covered Defense Information (CDI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).
  • Federal Cost Accounting Standards and FAR Part 31 allocation and reimbursement requirements.

Prior to joining Covington, Ryan served in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in the Executive Office of the President, where he focused on the development and implementation of government-wide contracting regulations and administrative actions affecting more than $400 billion dollars’ worth of goods and services each year.  While in government, Ryan helped develop several contracting-related Executive Orders, and worked with White House and agency officials on regulatory and policy matters affecting contractor disclosure and agency responsibility determinations, labor and employment issues, IT contracting, commercial item acquisitions, performance contracting, schedule contracting and interagency acquisitions, competition requirements, and suspension and debarment, among others.  Additionally, Ryan was selected to serve on a core team that led reform of security processes affecting federal background investigations for cleared federal employees and contractors in the wake of significant issues affecting the program.  These efforts resulted in the establishment of a semi-autonomous U.S. Government agency to conduct and manage background investigations.

Photo of Darby Rourick Darby Rourick

Darby Rourick advises defense and civilian contractors on a range of issues related to government contracting and has particular experience in federal cybersecurity and information technology supply chain issues. She has an active investigations practice and has experience representing clients in internal and…

Darby Rourick advises defense and civilian contractors on a range of issues related to government contracting and has particular experience in federal cybersecurity and information technology supply chain issues. She has an active investigations practice and has experience representing clients in internal and government investigations, including conducting witness interviews and managing government subpoena and CID responses. She also counsels clients on cybersecurity incident response; compliance with federal cybersecurity laws, regulations, and standards; supplier and subcontractor security issues; and cybersecurity related investigations.