This is the twenty-eighth in a series of Covington blogs on implementation of Executive Order 14028, “Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity,” issued by President Biden on May 12, 2021 (the “Cyber EO”).  The first blog summarized the Cyber EO’s key provisions and timelines, and the subsequent blogs described the actions taken by various government agencies to implement the Cyber EO from June 2021 through July 2023.  This blog describes key actions taken to implement the Cyber EO, as well as the U.S. National Cybersecurity Strategy, during August 2023. 

ONCD and Interagency Partners Publish a Request for Information (“RFI”) on Open-Source Software Security

On August 10, 2023, the Office of the National Cyber Director (“ONCD”) published a RFI seeking public comment on the Federal Government’s efforts to promote open-source software security as part of the Open-Source Software Security Initiative (“OS3I”).  The RFI was published in collaboration with interagency OS3I partners, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”), the National Science Foundation, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”), the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.  The RFI specifically seeks input on how the Federal Government “can lead, assist, or encourage other key stakeholders to advance progress” in open-source software security, including:

  • How “the Federal Government [should] contribute to driving down the most important systemic risks in open-source software;”
  • How “the Federal Government [can] help foster the long-term sustainability of open-source software communities;” and
  • How “open-source software security solutions [should] be implemented from a technical and resourcing perspective.”

Comments are being accepted through November 8, 2023 at 5:00 pm ET and may be submitted through Regulations.gov. 

FCC Seeks Input on Internet of Things (“IoT”) Labeling Program

On August 10, 2023, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) regarding the creation of a voluntary cybersecurity labeling program for IoT devices.  The FCC’s NPRM advances the Administration’s efforts – as outlined in the National Cybersecurity Strategy and Implementation Plan – to establish a program for placing a “U.S. Cyber Trust Mark” on qualifying products to “help consumers make informed purchasing decisions, differentiate trustworthy products in the marketplace, and create incentives for manufacturers to meet higher cybersecurity standards.”  The NPRM states that the program would be based on criteria developed by NIST and poses questions for comment, including (among others):

  • The “scope of devices or products for sale in the U.S. that should be eligible for inclusion in the labeling program;”
  • How “to develop the security standards that could apply to different types of devices or products;” and
  • How “to demonstrate compliance with those security standards.”

Public comments on the NPRM were due on or by September 25, 2023. 

ONCD Extends Deadline for Regulatory Harmonization RFI

On August 16, 2023, ONCD extended the deadline for companies and stakeholders to submit feedback on its Request for Information regarding harmonizing cybersecurity regulations.  Comments will now be accepted through October 31, 2023.  ONCD had originally published its RFI on July 19, 2023, seeking public input “to understand existing challenges with regulatory overlap and inconsistency in order to explore a framework for reciprocal recognition by regulators of compliance with common baseline cybersecurity requirements.”  ONCD’s RFI on harmonization advances one of the initiatives outlined by the Administration in its National Cybersecurity Strategy Implementation Plan.

CISA Blog Categorizes Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) as Software that Must Be Secure by Design

In a blog post published on August 18, 2023, CISA explained that AI is simply “a type of software” that, “like any software system, [] must be Secure by Design.”  In other words, CISA explained, “manufacturers of AI systems must consider the security of the customers as a core business requirement, not just a technical feature, and prioritize security throughout the whole lifecycle of the product, from inception of the idea to planning for the system’s end-of-life.”  Similarly, CISA’s blog stated that AI engineers “should apply existing community-expected security practices and policies for broader software design [and] software development[,]” including in regard to “AI software design, AI software development, AI data management, AI software deployment, AI system integration,” and many others.  In particular, CISA claimed that “AI engineering continues to take on too much technical debt where they have avoided applying these practices.”  CISA’s position that AI is software is another step in its promotion of Secure by Design principles following its guidance on Security-by-Design and Security-by-Default principles for technology manufacturers, which was released on April 13, 2023. 

NIST Updates Draft Implementation Guidance for Zero Trust Architecture

On August 22, 2023, NIST’s National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (“NCCoE”) published a third version of Volume D of its draft guidance on “Implementing a Zero Trust Architecture,” SP 1800-35D.  Specifically, “Volume D provides a functional demonstration plan[,] and the updated version includes demonstration results for ten builds.”  NCCoE is accepting comment on this guidance through October 9, 2023.  And moving forward, NCCoE has stated that it “will continue to update the volumes of NIST SP 1800-35 appropriately as needed as [it] make[s] significant progress on the project.”

NIST Publishes Draft Guidance for Integrating Software Security Concepts into Cloud Operations

On August 30, 2023, NIST released an initial draft of NIST SP 800-204D, “Strategies for the Integration of Software Supply Chain Security in DevSecOps CI/CD Pipeline.”  In accordance with the Cyber EO and NIST’s Secure Software Development Framework, the new guidance addresses “actionable measures to integrate the various building blocks of [software supply chain (“SSC”)] security assurance into [Continuous Integration / Continuous Delivery (“CI/CD”)] pipelines to prepare organizations to address SSC security in the development and deployment of their cloud-native applications.”  In particular, the new guidance:

  • Provides “a series of definitions for modeling and understanding software supply chains and their compromises;”
  • Sets out “a broad understanding of common risk factors and potential mitigation measures with a particular focus on the software developer environment;”
  • Describes “the background for CI/CD pipelines, the broad security goals of the processes involved, and the entities that need to be trusted;”
  • “Outlines strategies for integrating SSC security assurance measures into CI/CD pipelines;” and
  • Maps “the SSC security integration strategies for CI/CD pipelines to the SSDF’s high-level practices.” 

CISA is accepting public comment on its initial draft through October 13, 2023, which can be submitted by email to sp800-204d-comments@nist.gov

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Robert Huffman Robert Huffman

Bob Huffman counsels government contractors on emerging technology issues, including artificial intelligence (AI), cybersecurity, and software supply chain security, that are currently affecting federal and state procurement. His areas of expertise include the Department of Defense (DOD) and other agency acquisition regulations governing…

Bob Huffman counsels government contractors on emerging technology issues, including artificial intelligence (AI), cybersecurity, and software supply chain security, that are currently affecting federal and state procurement. His areas of expertise include the Department of Defense (DOD) and other agency acquisition regulations governing information security and the reporting of cyber incidents, the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program, the requirements for secure software development self-attestations and bills of materials (SBOMs) emanating from the May 2021 Executive Order on Cybersecurity, and the various requirements for responsible AI procurement, safety, and testing currently being implemented under the October 2023 AI Executive Order. 

Bob also represents contractors in False Claims Act (FCA) litigation and investigations involving cybersecurity and other technology compliance issues, as well more traditional government contracting costs, quality, and regulatory compliance issues. These investigations include significant parallel civil/criminal proceedings growing out of the Department of Justice’s Cyber Fraud Initiative. They also include investigations resulting from False Claims Act qui tam lawsuits and other enforcement proceedings. Bob has represented clients in over a dozen FCA qui tam suits.

Bob also regularly counsels clients on government contracting supply chain compliance issues, including those arising under the Buy American Act/Trade Agreements Act and Section 889 of the FY2019 National Defense Authorization Act. In addition, Bob advises government contractors on rules relating to IP, including government patent rights, technical data rights, rights in computer software, and the rules applicable to IP in the acquisition of commercial products, services, and software. He focuses this aspect of his practice on the overlap of these traditional government contracts IP rules with the IP issues associated with the acquisition of AI services and the data needed to train the large learning models on which those services are based. 

Bob is ranked by Chambers USA for his work in government contracts and he writes extensively in the areas of procurement-related AI, cybersecurity, software security, and supply chain regulation. He also teaches a course at Georgetown Law School that focuses on the technology, supply chain, and national security issues associated with energy and climate change.

Photo of Susan B. Cassidy Susan B. Cassidy

Susan is co-chair of the firm’s Aerospace and Defense Industry Group and is a partner in the firm’s Government Contracts and Cybersecurity Practice Groups. She previously served as in-house counsel for two major defense contractors and advises a broad range of government contractors…

Susan is co-chair of the firm’s Aerospace and Defense Industry Group and is a partner in the firm’s Government Contracts and Cybersecurity Practice Groups. She previously served as in-house counsel for two major defense contractors and advises a broad range of government contractors on compliance with FAR and DFARS requirements, with a special expertise in supply chain, cybersecurity and FedRAMP requirements. She has an active investigations practice and advises contractors when faced with cyber incidents involving government information, as well as representing contractors facing allegations of cyber fraud under the False Claims Act. Susan relies on her expertise and experience with the Defense Department and the Intelligence Community to help her clients navigate the complex regulatory intersection of cybersecurity, national security, and government contracts. She is Chambers rated in both Government Contracts and Government Contracts Cybersecurity. In 2023, Chambers USA quoted sources stating that “Susan’s in-house experience coupled with her deep understanding of the regulatory requirements is the perfect balance to navigate legal and commercial matters.”

Her clients range from new entrants into the federal procurement market to well established defense contractors and she provides compliance advices across a broad spectrum of procurement issues. Susan consistently remains at the forefront of legislative and regulatory changes in the procurement area, and in 2018, the National Law Review selected her as a “Go-to Thought Leader” on the topic of Cybersecurity for Government Contractors.

In her work with global, national, and start-up contractors, Susan advises companies on all aspects of government supply chain issues including:

  • Government cybersecurity requirements, including the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), DFARS 7012, and NIST SP 800-171 requirements,
  • Evolving sourcing issues such as Section 889, counterfeit part requirements, Section 5949 and limitations on sourcing from China
  • Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC) regulations and product exclusions,
  • Controlled unclassified information (CUI) obligations, and
  • M&A government cybersecurity due diligence.

Susan has an active internal investigations practice that assists clients when allegations of non-compliance arise with procurement requirements, such as in the following areas:

  • Procurement fraud and FAR mandatory disclosure requirements,
  • Cyber incidents and data spills involving sensitive government information,
  • Allegations of violations of national security requirements, and
  • Compliance with MIL-SPEC requirements, the Qualified Products List, and other sourcing obligations.

In addition to her counseling and investigatory practice, Susan has considerable litigation experience and has represented clients in bid protests, prime-subcontractor disputes, Administrative Procedure Act cases, and product liability litigation before federal courts, state courts, and administrative agencies.

Susan is a former Public Contract Law Procurement Division Co-Chair, former Co-Chair and current Vice-Chair of the ABA PCL Cybersecurity, Privacy and Emerging Technology Committee.

Prior to joining Covington, Susan served as in-house senior counsel at Northrop Grumman Corporation and Motorola Incorporated.

Photo of Ashden Fein Ashden Fein

Ashden Fein is a vice chair of the firm’s global Cybersecurity practice. He advises clients on cybersecurity and national security matters, including crisis management and incident response, risk management and governance, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

For cybersecurity matters, Ashden counsels clients…

Ashden Fein is a vice chair of the firm’s global Cybersecurity practice. He advises clients on cybersecurity and national security matters, including crisis management and incident response, risk management and governance, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

For cybersecurity matters, Ashden counsels clients on preparing for and responding to cyber-based attacks, assessing security controls and practices for the protection of data and systems, developing and implementing cybersecurity risk management and governance programs, and complying with federal and state regulatory requirements. Ashden frequently supports clients as the lead investigator and crisis manager for global cyber and data security incidents, including data breaches involving personal data, advanced persistent threats targeting intellectual property across industries, state-sponsored theft of sensitive U.S. government information, extortion and ransomware, and destructive attacks.

Additionally, Ashden assists clients from across industries with leading internal investigations and responding to government inquiries related to the U.S. national security and insider risks. He also advises aerospace, defense, and intelligence contractors on security compliance under U.S. national security laws and regulations including, among others, the National Industrial Security Program (NISPOM), U.S. government cybersecurity regulations, FedRAMP, and requirements related to supply chain security.

Before joining Covington, Ashden served on active duty in the U.S. Army as a Military Intelligence officer and prosecutor specializing in cybercrime and national security investigations and prosecutions — to include serving as the lead trial lawyer in the prosecution of Private Chelsea (Bradley) Manning for the unlawful disclosure of classified information to Wikileaks.

Ashden currently serves as a Judge Advocate in the
U.S. Army Reserve.

Photo of Michael Wagner Michael Wagner

Mike Wagner represents companies and individuals in complex compliance and enforcement matters arising in the public procurement context. Combining deep regulatory expertise and extensive investigations experience, Mike helps government contractors navigate detailed procurement rules and achieve the efficient resolution of government investigations and…

Mike Wagner represents companies and individuals in complex compliance and enforcement matters arising in the public procurement context. Combining deep regulatory expertise and extensive investigations experience, Mike helps government contractors navigate detailed procurement rules and achieve the efficient resolution of government investigations and enforcement actions.

Mike regularly represents contractors in federal and state compliance and enforcement matters relating to a range of procurement laws and regulations. He has particular experience handling investigations and litigation brought under the civil False Claims Act, and he routinely counsels government contractors on mandatory and voluntary disclosure considerations under the FAR, DFARS, and related regulatory regimes. He also represents contractors in high-stakes suspension and debarment matters at the federal and state levels, and he has served as Co-Chair of the ABA Suspension & Debarment Committee and is principal editor of the American Bar Association’s Practitioner’s Guide to Suspension & Debarment (4th ed.) (2018).

Mike also has extensive experience representing companies pursuing and negotiating grants, cooperative agreements, and Other Transaction Authority agreements (OTAs). In this regard, he has particular familiarity with the semiconductor and clean energy industries, and he has devoted substantial time in recent years to advising clients on strategic considerations for pursuing opportunities under the CHIPS Act, Inflation Reduction Act, and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

In his counseling practice, Mike regularly advises government contractors and suppliers on best practices for managing the rapidly-evolving array of cybersecurity and supply chain security rules and requirements. In particular, he helps companies assess and navigate domestic preference and country-of-origin requirements under the Buy American Act (BAA), Trade Agreements Act (TAA), Berry Amendment, and DOD Specialty Metals regulation. He also assists clients in managing product and information security considerations related to overseas manufacture and development of Information and Communication Technologies & Services (ICTS).

Mike serves on Covington’s Hiring Committee and is Co-Chair of the firm’s Summer Associate Program. He is a frequent writer and speaker on issues relating to procurement fraud and contractor responsibility, and he has served as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University Law School.

Photo of Ryan Burnette Ryan Burnette

Ryan Burnette is a government contracts and technology-focused lawyer that advises on federal contracting compliance requirements and on government and internal investigations that stem from these obligations. Ryan has particular experience with defense and intelligence contracting, as well as with cybersecurity, supply chain…

Ryan Burnette is a government contracts and technology-focused lawyer that advises on federal contracting compliance requirements and on government and internal investigations that stem from these obligations. Ryan has particular experience with defense and intelligence contracting, as well as with cybersecurity, supply chain, artificial intelligence, and software development requirements.

Ryan also advises on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) compliance, public policy matters, agency disputes, and government cost accounting, drawing on his prior experience in providing overall direction for the federal contracting system to offer insight on the practical implications of regulations. He has assisted industry clients with the resolution of complex civil and criminal investigations by the Department of Justice, and he regularly speaks and writes on government contracts, cybersecurity, national security, and emerging technology topics.

Ryan is especially experienced with:

  • Government cybersecurity standards, including the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP); DFARS 252.204-7012, DFARS 252.204-7020, and other agency cybersecurity requirements; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) publications, such as NIST SP 800-171; and the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program.
  • Software and artificial intelligence (AI) requirements, including federal secure software development frameworks and software security attestations; software bill of materials requirements; and current and forthcoming AI data disclosure, validation, and configuration requirements, including unique requirements that are applicable to the use of large language models (LLMs) and dual use foundation models.
  • Supply chain requirements, including Section 889 of the FY19 National Defense Authorization Act; restrictions on covered semiconductors and printed circuit boards; Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS) restrictions; and federal exclusionary authorities, such as matters relating to the Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC).
  • Information handling, marking, and dissemination requirements, including those relating to Covered Defense Information (CDI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).
  • Federal Cost Accounting Standards and FAR Part 31 allocation and reimbursement requirements.

Prior to joining Covington, Ryan served in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in the Executive Office of the President, where he focused on the development and implementation of government-wide contracting regulations and administrative actions affecting more than $400 billion dollars’ worth of goods and services each year.  While in government, Ryan helped develop several contracting-related Executive Orders, and worked with White House and agency officials on regulatory and policy matters affecting contractor disclosure and agency responsibility determinations, labor and employment issues, IT contracting, commercial item acquisitions, performance contracting, schedule contracting and interagency acquisitions, competition requirements, and suspension and debarment, among others.  Additionally, Ryan was selected to serve on a core team that led reform of security processes affecting federal background investigations for cleared federal employees and contractors in the wake of significant issues affecting the program.  These efforts resulted in the establishment of a semi-autonomous U.S. Government agency to conduct and manage background investigations.

Photo of Matthew Harden Matthew Harden

Matthew Harden is a cybersecurity and litigation associate in the firm’s New York office. He advises on a broad range of cybersecurity, data privacy, and national security matters, including cybersecurity incident response, cybersecurity and privacy compliance obligations, internal investigations, and regulatory inquiries. He…

Matthew Harden is a cybersecurity and litigation associate in the firm’s New York office. He advises on a broad range of cybersecurity, data privacy, and national security matters, including cybersecurity incident response, cybersecurity and privacy compliance obligations, internal investigations, and regulatory inquiries. He works with clients across industries, including in the technology, financial services, defense, entertainment and media, life sciences, and healthcare industries.

As part of his cybersecurity practice, Matthew provides strategic advice on cybersecurity and data privacy issues, including cybersecurity investigations, cybersecurity incident response, artificial intelligence, and Internet of Things (IoT). He also assists clients with drafting, designing, and assessing enterprise cybersecurity and information security policies, procedures, and plans.

As part of his litigation and investigations practice, Matthew leverages his cybersecurity experience to advise clients on high-stakes litigation matters and investigations. He also maintains an active pro bono practice focused on veterans’ rights.

Matthew currently serves as a Judge Advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard Reserve.