On May 5, 2020 the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (“CISA”) Information and Communications Technology (“ICT”) Supply Chain Risk Management (“SCRM”) Task Force (the “Task Force”) released a six-step guide for organizations to start implementing organizational SCRM practices to improve their overall security resilience.  The Task Force also released a revised fact sheet to further raise awareness about ICT supply chain risk.

As we discussed in a prior blog post on the Task Force’s efforts, the Task Force was established in 2018 with representatives from 17 different defense and civilian agencies, as well as industry representatives across the information technology and communications sectors.  The Task Force has been focused on assessing and protecting security vulnerabilities in government supply chains.  Since its founding, the Task Force has inventoried existing SCRM efforts across the government and industry, including some of the practices reflected in the guide.

The six step guide (key points from which are described in the table below) captures the basic blocking and tackling that companies should consider when establishing their SCRM processes and procedures.

Step:

 

       Notable Actions Relating to Step:
1.  Identify

(Determine who from your organization needs to be involved.)

  • Include subject matter experts in cybersecurity, information technology, product development and security, legal, logistics, physical security, acquisition, marketing, and leadership.
  • Bridge offices to create information sharing, metrics, and program objectives that will ultimately reduce supply chain risks.
  • Include representatives from all levels of the organization, including operators.

 

2.  Manage

(Develop supply chain security policies and procedures.)

 

  • Direct the establishment of an enterprise-wide supply chain risk management program.
  • Establish standard operating procedures on how to conduct supply chain risk management and maintain compliance, to include training.
  • Promote supply chain risk management as a business priority.

 

3.  Assess

(Understand the hardware, software, and services that you procure.)

 

  • Understand the critical information in your organization and where it resides.
  • Determine the different parts of your information and communications technology supply chain.
  • Determine the hardware, software, and managed services most pertinent to your organization.  Track the critical components that your organization procures.

 

4.  Know

(Map your supply chain to better understand what components you procure.)

 

  • Answer the question: From which companies do you procure your assets, hardware, software, and services?
  • Consider asking for information about their supply chain risk management practices.
  • Limit suppliers’ access to only the data they need to conduct business.

 

5.  Verify

(Determine how your organization will assess the security culture of suppliers.)

 

  • Set standards for your vendors in terms of their systems, processes, and extended supplier security requirements.  Establish security requirements (e.g., on-site security).
  • Set service-level agreements requiring suppliers to adhere to security policies.
  • Identify methods for assessing assurance and how they will be measured (e.g., self-attestation, auditing).

 

6.  Evaluate

(Establish systems for checking supply chain practices against guidelines.)

  • Establish security as a primary metric (just like cost, schedule, and performance) for assessing a vendor’s ability to meet contract requirements.
  • Implement the program and monitor suppliers’ and your organization’s adherence to SCRM requirements.
  • Determine the schedule at which systems will be monitored against guidelines.

 

Companies—especially those that do business with the U.S. Government—should evaluate these steps and the extent to which any actions they have already taken comport with this new guidance.  Of particular importance are Steps 3 and 4, which urge companies to assess and understand their supply chain.  Placing emphasis on these steps could provide organizations with the greatest return on investment.  In particular, organizations should consider additional assessment activities in Step 3, including an assessment of the threats (such as insider threats, economic espionage, data manipulation, foreign control and influence) to critical information and ICT components in their organization and the risk those threats pose to the four areas highlighted by the framework (operations, reputation, bottom line, and organizational resilience).  And, as reflected in Step 4, knowing suppliers and, when possible, the suppliers’ sources, is crucial to mitigating supply chain risks.

Although the Task Force’s suggested actions are not required, a concerted and ongoing effort to adhere to this guidance would likely be viewed favorably by the U.S. Government and signal that a company is taking these issues seriously.  For U.S. Government contractors, adherence to the guidance may be critical as the U.S. Government increasingly is looking to its contractors to act as a first line of defense to mitigate vulnerabilities in the Government’s ICT supply chain.  This is particularly true as new regulations relating to supply chain management are finalized that apply to contractors, and in some cases, to commercial companies.  These requirements include Section 889(a)(1)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) for Fiscal Year 2019 (generally prohibiting the U.S. Government from contracting with any “entity” that “uses” Prohibited Products and Services); Section 1654 and 1655 of the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2019 (generally requiring disclosure to DoD if a company has allowed the source code of products sold or intended to be sold to DoD to be reviewed by certain foreign adversaries of the U.S. Government); and Executive Order 13873 and the Department of Commerce’s proposed rule implementing the order (authorizing the U.S. Government to prohibit, mitigate, or unwind certain commercial transactions dealing in or using any information and communications technology and services, discussed in detail in our prior Client Alert).

Each of these forthcoming requirements could have potentially significant implications for companies that sell or procure ICT products.  Early steps to focus on improving security resiliency in existing supply chains will help in preparation for compliance with these requirements and others from the U.S. Government that will inevitably follow.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Susan B. Cassidy Susan B. Cassidy

Susan Cassidy co-chairs Covington’s Aerospace and Defense Industry Group, and has been advising government contractors for more than 35 years on the requirements imposed on companies contracting with the U.S. Government.

Susan’s practice focuses on the intersection of cybersecurity, national security, and supply…

Susan Cassidy co-chairs Covington’s Aerospace and Defense Industry Group, and has been advising government contractors for more than 35 years on the requirements imposed on companies contracting with the U.S. Government.

Susan’s practice focuses on the intersection of cybersecurity, national security, and supply chain risk management for companies that sell products and services to the U.S. Government. Susan advises contractors at all phases of the procurement cycle, and regularly:

advises clients on compliance obligations imposed by the FAR, DFARS, and other agency regulatory requirements;
leads internal and government False Claims Act (FCA) investigations addressing allegations of violations of government cybersecurity, national security, supply chain, quality, and MIL-SPEC requirements; and
advises clients who have suffered a cyber breach where U.S. government information may have been impacted.

In her work with global, national, and start-up contractors, Susan advises companies on all aspects of government supply chain issues including:

Government cybersecurity requirements, including the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), DFARS 252.204-7012, FedRAMP, controlled unclassified information (CUI), and NIST SP 800-171 requirements;
Evolving sourcing issues such as Section 889, counterfeit part requirements, Section 5949 semiconductor product and service restrictions, and limitations on sourcing a variety of products from China; and
Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC) regulations and product exclusions.

 

Susan previously served as senior in-house counsel for two major defense contractors (Northrop Grumman Corporation and Motorola Incorporated) and is Chambers rated in both Government Contracts and Government Contracts Cybersecurity. Chambers USA has quoted sources stating that “Susan’s in-house experience coupled with her deep understanding of the regulatory requirements is the perfect balance to navigate legal and commercial matters.”

Susan is a former Public Contract Law Procurement Division Co-Chair, former Co-Chair and current Vice-Chair of the ABA PCL Cybersecurity, Privacy and Emerging Technology Committee.

Susan’s pro-bono work extends to assisting veterans in a variety of matters, as well as providing advice to elderly clients on their wills and other end-of-life planning documents.

Photo of Ryan Burnette Ryan Burnette

Ryan Burnette is a government contracts and technology-focused lawyer that advises on federal contracting compliance requirements and on government and internal investigations that stem from these obligations. Ryan has particular experience with defense and intelligence contracting, as well as with cybersecurity, supply chain…

Ryan Burnette is a government contracts and technology-focused lawyer that advises on federal contracting compliance requirements and on government and internal investigations that stem from these obligations. Ryan has particular experience with defense and intelligence contracting, as well as with cybersecurity, supply chain, artificial intelligence, and software development requirements.

Ryan also advises on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) compliance, public policy matters, agency disputes, and government cost accounting, drawing on his prior experience in providing overall direction for the federal contracting system to offer insight on the practical implications of regulations. He has assisted industry clients with the resolution of complex civil and criminal investigations by the Department of Justice, and he regularly speaks and writes on government contracts, cybersecurity, national security, and emerging technology topics.

Ryan is especially experienced with:

Government cybersecurity standards, including the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP); DFARS 252.204-7012, DFARS 252.204-7020, and other agency cybersecurity requirements; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) publications, such as NIST SP 800-171; and the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program.
Software and artificial intelligence (AI) requirements, including federal secure software development frameworks and software security attestations; software bill of materials requirements; and current and forthcoming AI data disclosure, validation, and configuration requirements, including unique requirements that are applicable to the use of large language models (LLMs) and dual use foundation models.
Supply chain requirements, including Section 889 of the FY19 National Defense Authorization Act; restrictions on covered semiconductors and printed circuit boards; Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS) restrictions; and federal exclusionary authorities, such as matters relating to the Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC).
Information handling, marking, and dissemination requirements, including those relating to Covered Defense Information (CDI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).
Federal Cost Accounting Standards and FAR Part 31 allocation and reimbursement requirements.

Prior to joining Covington, Ryan served in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in the Executive Office of the President, where he focused on the development and implementation of government-wide contracting regulations and administrative actions affecting more than $400 billion dollars’ worth of goods and services each year.  While in government, Ryan helped develop several contracting-related Executive Orders, and worked with White House and agency officials on regulatory and policy matters affecting contractor disclosure and agency responsibility determinations, labor and employment issues, IT contracting, commercial item acquisitions, performance contracting, schedule contracting and interagency acquisitions, competition requirements, and suspension and debarment, among others.  Additionally, Ryan was selected to serve on a core team that led reform of security processes affecting federal background investigations for cleared federal employees and contractors in the wake of significant issues affecting the program.  These efforts resulted in the establishment of a semi-autonomous U.S. Government agency to conduct and manage background investigations.