On August 14, 2014, the U.S. Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) issued a final rule clarifying the existing standards and procedures for, and expanding the reach of, the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (“DPAS”) regulations – the “rated order” system.  Specifically, the final rule proposes new standards and procedures for such prioritization with respect to contracts or orders for emergency preparedness activities and provides new standards and procedures by which BIS may allocate materials, services, and facilities to promote the national defense.

Under the priorities component of DPAS, certain “rated” government contracts and subcontracts are required to be given priority over a contractor’s or subcontractor’s other contracts (including its purely commercial operations) to facilitate expedited deliveries in promotion of the U.S. national defense.  Under the allocation component, materials, services, and facilities may be allocated by the government to promote the U.S. national defense.  The final rule adopts a proposed rule that was issued on January 31, 2014.

The final rule’s changes include following:

  • Expands the scope of rated orders to include homeland security, emergency preparedness, and critical infrastructure protection and restoration activities;
  • Authorizes agencies to require acceptance or rejection of rated orders for emergency preparedness activities in as little as 6 hours after receipt of an order in response to a hazard that has occurred (e.g., a natural disaster or terrorist event), or 12 hours if the order is to prepare for an imminent hazard (as compared to the 10 to 15 working days allowed for responses to other rated orders);
  • Requires a contractor’s written confirmation that an order will be delayed to be transmitted within one working day of the contractor or subcontractor providing verbal notice of the delay (versus five days under the previous version of the DPAS regulations);
  • Provides a procedure for requesting assistance in obtaining rated items or priority rating authority for homeland security, emergency preparedness, and critical infrastructure protection and restoration assistance programs within the United States; and
  • Permits allocation orders to be issued by constructive notice through a publication in the Federal Register (which may refer generally to all manufacturers of a specified product and is not required to name every manufacturer of that product).

Congress had required federal agencies with priorities and allocations authority to work together to develop a consistent and unified federal priorities and allocations system.  Thus, BIS worked with the Departments of Agriculture, Defense, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, and Transportation to develop common provisions that can be used by each Department in its own regulations.

The final rule will become effective on September 15, 2014. In the interim, contractors should review their policies and procedures related to the handling of rated orders to, among other things, ensure that they are prepared to respond to rated orders in the new compressed timeframes outlined above.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Susan B. Cassidy Susan B. Cassidy

Susan Cassidy co-chairs Covington’s Aerospace and Defense Industry Group, and has been advising government contractors for more than 35 years on the requirements imposed on companies contracting with the U.S. Government.

Susan’s practice focuses on the intersection of cybersecurity, national security, and supply…

Susan Cassidy co-chairs Covington’s Aerospace and Defense Industry Group, and has been advising government contractors for more than 35 years on the requirements imposed on companies contracting with the U.S. Government.

Susan’s practice focuses on the intersection of cybersecurity, national security, and supply chain risk management for companies that sell products and services to the U.S. Government. Susan advises contractors at all phases of the procurement cycle, and regularly:

advises clients on compliance obligations imposed by the FAR, DFARS, and other agency regulatory requirements;
leads internal and government False Claims Act (FCA) investigations addressing allegations of violations of government cybersecurity, national security, supply chain, quality, and MIL-SPEC requirements; and
advises clients who have suffered a cyber breach where U.S. government information may have been impacted.

In her work with global, national, and start-up contractors, Susan advises companies on all aspects of government supply chain issues including:

Government cybersecurity requirements, including the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), DFARS 252.204-7012, FedRAMP, controlled unclassified information (CUI), and NIST SP 800-171 requirements;
Evolving sourcing issues such as Section 889, counterfeit part requirements, Section 5949 semiconductor product and service restrictions, and limitations on sourcing a variety of products from China; and
Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC) regulations and product exclusions.

 

Susan previously served as senior in-house counsel for two major defense contractors (Northrop Grumman Corporation and Motorola Incorporated) and is Chambers rated in both Government Contracts and Government Contracts Cybersecurity. Chambers USA has quoted sources stating that “Susan’s in-house experience coupled with her deep understanding of the regulatory requirements is the perfect balance to navigate legal and commercial matters.”

Susan is a former Public Contract Law Procurement Division Co-Chair, former Co-Chair and current Vice-Chair of the ABA PCL Cybersecurity, Privacy and Emerging Technology Committee.

Susan’s pro-bono work extends to assisting veterans in a variety of matters, as well as providing advice to elderly clients on their wills and other end-of-life planning documents.