As federal agencies are slated to spend almost $80 billion on federal information technology (“IT”) acquisitions this fiscal year and the OMB prepares to issue its final guidance on the Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (“FITARA”), GAO has released two reports this month that discuss ongoing efforts to improve IT procurement.  Combined with GAO’s recent addition of IT acquisitions and operations to its list of high-risk programs (which we previously discussed), these new reports underscore GAO’s ongoing emphasis on reforming IT acquisitions to reduce redundancy and increase efficiency.

In the first report, GAO added federal software licenses to its list of twenty-four areas in which it discovered evidence of fragmentation, overlap, or duplication in federal government programs.  Citing its May 2014 report on federal agencies’ management of software licenses, GAO explained that a vast majority of agencies do not have sufficient policies to manage their software licenses.  According to GAO, this mismanagement results in over-purchasing licenses, which leads to unnecessary spending, and under-purchasing licenses, which leads to fees for violating licensing agreements.  Therefore, GAO reemphasized that agencies should implement software license management policies that, among other things, provide for centralized management of software licenses and ensure that a software license inventory is created and maintained.

In addition to adding federal software licenses to its list of areas prone to fragmentation, duplication, and overlap, GAO discussed additional ways for Congress and executive branch agencies to reduce unnecessary duplication and spending in critical IT areas.  Specifically, GAO emphasized the importance of OMB’s efforts to identify opportunities for consolidation of federal data centers and encouraged agencies to complete their data center inventories and implement their consolidation plans.  In addition, GAO noted that close to three-quarters of the almost $80 billion in federal IT spending this fiscal year will be used on the operation and maintenance of legacy investments.  In light of this spending, GAO encouraged agencies to ensure that these legacy systems continue to meet their needs, deliver value, and do not unnecessarily overlap with other investments.

GAO also noted that agencies could better utilize the OMB’s PortfolioStat initiative to manage their existing IT systems.  PortfolioStat requires agencies to conduct annual, agency-wide reviews of IT portfolios with a view towards reducing IT spending and ensuring that their IT investments align with their missions and business functions.  Citing to its more than 60 past recommendations to agencies and the OMB related to the PortfolioStat initiative, GAO encouraged wider execution of this program.  A second GAO report, released last week, underscores the agencies’ ongoing struggles in the implementation of the PortfolioStat initiative.  GAO noted that the agencies have reduced their projected PortfolioStat savings by almost 70 percent, or $3.8 billion, for fiscal years 2013 to 2015.  The Department of Defense and Homeland Security accounted for most of the difference, as they reported a reduction of approximately $3.5 billion in anticipated savings.  GAO further reported that only nine of 26 agencies have met their reduced cost-saving estimates for fiscal years 2013 and 2014.  That said, GAO noted the difficulty in calculating the agencies’ cost savings due to inconsistencies in how savings are reported.  Specifically, GAO explained that agencies have other cost saving initiatives, such as the consolidation of federal data centers, that they have reported as part of their PortfolioStat savings to OMB, but not GAO, and visa-versa.

These recent GAO reports further underscore the ongoing struggles in reforming IT acquisitions and operations, as well as the difficulty of tracking progress in this area.  These struggles will make it increasingly difficult for government contractors to anticipate and respond to agencies’ IT acquisition needs.  As a result, the IT contracting community would be well advised to continue monitoring IT acquisition reforms, especially as OMB issues its final guidance on FITARA later this year.

Print:
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn
Photo of Jennifer Plitsch Jennifer Plitsch

Jennifer Plitsch is co-chair of the firm’s Government Contracts practice group. Her practice includes a wide range of contracting issues for large and small businesses in both defense and civilian contracting. Her practice involves advising clients on contract proposal, performance, and compliance questions…

Jennifer Plitsch is co-chair of the firm’s Government Contracts practice group. Her practice includes a wide range of contracting issues for large and small businesses in both defense and civilian contracting. Her practice involves advising clients on contract proposal, performance, and compliance questions as well as transactional and legislative issues. Her practice also includes bid protest and contract claims and appeals litigation before GAO, agency boards and the federal courts. Ms. Plitsch has particular expertise in advising clients in the pharmaceutical and biologics industry. She advises a range of pharmaceutical and biologics manufacturers on Federal Supply Schedule contracts, including the complex pricing requirements imposed on products under the Veterans Health Care Act, as well as research and development contracts and grants with various federal agencies. She also has significant experience advising on the requirements of various programs under which vaccine products and biodefense medical countermeasures are procured by the Government.

Photo of Alexander Hastings Alexander Hastings

Alex Hastings advises clients across a broad range of government contracting issues, including advising clients in transactional matters involving government contractors and assisting defense contractors and pharmaceutical companies in securing and performing government contracts.

Mr. Hastings also advises clients concerning best practices in…

Alex Hastings advises clients across a broad range of government contracting issues, including advising clients in transactional matters involving government contractors and assisting defense contractors and pharmaceutical companies in securing and performing government contracts.

Mr. Hastings also advises clients concerning best practices in e-discovery. He assists in investigations and litigations that involve complex e-discovery issues and has represented clients in matters involving the U.S. Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States International Trade Commission.

Mr. Hastings’ government contracts experience includes advising clients regarding new developments in regulatory requirements, including the Federal Acquisition Regulation’s (FAR) anti-human trafficking requirements and the FAR and Bayh-Dole Act’s intellectual property provisions. Mr. Hastings also provides due diligence regulatory advice to clients contemplating the acquisition of government contracting entities or assets.

Mr. Hastings’ e-discovery experience includes advising a wide-array of clients on best practices in information governance and document collection and assisting clients develop effective mobile device and document management policies.

Mr. Hastings also maintains an active pro bono practice and routinely writes on issues related to government contracts and e-discovery.