Last week, the U.S. Department of Labor announced that it has recovered $1,914,681.50 in back wages and fringe benefits allegedly owed to 147 workers of a Nevada-based company that provided construction services as a subcontractor at the Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project, a federally supported solar power development located near Tonopah, Nevada.  The DOL investigation found that the construction company had “violated the prevailing wage and fringe benefits requirements of the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts for the majority of their employees working at the Tonopah desert solar energy project.”   

The Davis-Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA) generally require contractors and subcontractors working on contracts for construction, alteration, or repair of public buildings and public works, and which involve federal funding, to pay laborers and mechanics “no less than the locally prevailing wages and fringe benefits for corresponding work on similar projects in the area.”  DOL explained in its recent press release that the DBRA’s wage and fringe benefit provisions applied to the Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project because “its funding includes hundreds of millions of dollars in federal loan guarantees” from the U.S. Department of Energy under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.  The DOL found that the Nevada-based company has violated the DBRA from June 2013 through April 2014 because it did not pay workers the “correct prevailing wage rates and fringe benefits for their particular job duties.”  Specifically, DOL found that the company “paid ‘general laborers’ rates to workers that routinely performed duties in skilled trades, such as ironworking, electrical work, painting or bridge crane operation, that should have commanded fringe benefits and prevailing wages of up to two times more than they were paid.” 

As part of its agreement with the DOL, the Nevada-based company has also agreed to raise awareness with other employers working at the Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project about the DBRA’s prevailing wage requirements.  This recent settlement comes on the heels of similar DOL enforcement actions, and underscore the need for renewable energy developers and their construction subcontractors to understand the wage and fringe benefit obligations that generally apply to federally assisted projects, including power purchase agreements, enhanced use lease projects, grants, and loan guarantees.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Scott A. Freling Scott A. Freling

Scott Freling represents civilian and defense contractors, at all stages of the procurement process, in their dealings with federal, state, and local government customers and with other contractors. He has a broad-based government contracts practice, which includes compliance counseling, internal investigations, strategic procurement…

Scott Freling represents civilian and defense contractors, at all stages of the procurement process, in their dealings with federal, state, and local government customers and with other contractors. He has a broad-based government contracts practice, which includes compliance counseling, internal investigations, strategic procurement advice, claims and other disputes, teaming and subcontracting, and mergers and acquisitions. He represents clients in federal and state court litigation and administrative proceedings, including bid protests before the Government Accountability Office and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He also represents clients in obtaining and maintaining SAFETY Act liability protection for anti-terrorism technologies. Mr. Freling’s experience covers a wide variety of industries, including defense and aerospace, information technology and software, government services, life sciences, renewable energy, and private equity investment in government contractors.